StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Lit vs Material Design

Lit vs Material Design

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design
Material Design
Stacks594
Followers890
Votes14
Lit
Lit
Stacks126
Followers36
Votes4
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks94

Lit vs Material Design: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web design, choosing the right framework can make a significant impact on the overall look and feel of a website. Lit and Material Design are two popular frameworks used for creating visually appealing and interactive web applications. Understanding their key differences can help developers make informed decisions when selecting a framework for their projects.

  1. Styling Approach: Lit follows a more minimalistic and lightweight approach when it comes to styling components, allowing developers more flexibility in customizing the look and feel of their applications. On the other hand, Material Design offers a more structured and opinionated design system with predefined styles and components, making it easier for developers to maintain consistency throughout their projects.

  2. Component Library: Lit provides a smaller set of core components, focusing on essential UI elements that can be easily extended or customized based on specific project requirements. In contrast, Material Design offers a comprehensive library of components, including complex layouts and interactive elements, enabling developers to quickly build rich and engaging user interfaces without starting from scratch.

  3. Animation and Interaction: Lit emphasizes performance and responsiveness by utilizing modern web technologies like Web Components and CSS Custom Properties for efficient animations and interactions. Material Design, on the other hand, leverages the power of JavaScript frameworks like Angular and React to create highly dynamic and interactive user experiences with advanced animations and transitions.

  4. Theming and Customization: Lit provides a more flexible theming system that allows developers to easily customize the visual appearance of components using CSS variables and shadow parts. Material Design, on the other hand, offers a robust theming mechanism with predefined color palettes and typography styles, making it easier to create visually consistent designs across different applications.

  5. Accessibility and Usability: Lit focuses on accessibility by ensuring that components are keyboard navigable, screen reader friendly, and adhere to best practices for inclusive design. Material Design also places a strong emphasis on accessibility, providing detailed guidelines and tools to help developers create user-friendly interfaces that meet WCAG standards and cater to diverse user needs.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Lit has a growing community of developers and contributors who actively maintain and improve the framework, providing regular updates and support for new features and enhancements. Material Design, backed by Google, offers a larger ecosystem with resources, tools, and case studies to help developers design and implement modern applications following best practices in UX and UI design.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Lit and Material Design can help developers choose the right framework based on their project requirements and design preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material Design, Lit

Ashish
Ashish

Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software

Dec 29, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapMaterial DesignMaterial DesignTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

735k views735k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Jan 3, 2021

Review

Hi Ashish,

If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.

If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.

Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.

If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.

307k views307k
Comments
Ryan
Ryan

Mar 11, 2021

Decided

Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.

We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.

We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's

220k views220k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material Design
Material Design
Lit
Lit

Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.

A tiny CSS framework that preserves everything Skeleton, Milligram, and other micro frameworks have to offer.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
94
Stacks
594
Stacks
126
Followers
890
Followers
36
Votes
14
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    They really set a new bar in design
  • 4
    An intuitive design
  • 3
    Simply, And Beautiful
  • 2
    Many great libraries
  • 0
    Composants
Cons
  • 2
    Sometimes, it can hang the browser
Pros
  • 2
    Performance
  • 2
    Lit-html

What are some alternatives to Material Design, Lit?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase