Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Log4j

3.1K
99
+ 1
0
Zap

10
30
+ 1
0
Add tool

Log4j vs Zap: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Log4j and Zap

1. Configuration Flexibility: Log4j offers more flexibility in its configuration options compared to Zap. With Log4j, you can configure various appenders, filters, and log levels in a highly customizable manner. On the other hand, Zap has a simpler configuration approach, providing a limited set of configuration options.

2. Performance: Log4j is known for its high-performance logging capabilities and is optimized to handle a large volume of log data efficiently. In contrast, Zap may not be as performant as Log4j, especially when dealing with heavy log traffic or complex logging requirements.

3. Extensibility and Integrations: Log4j provides a wide range of extensions, including appenders for different output formats, filters, and custom layouts. It also offers seamless integrations with popular frameworks and libraries. Zap, on the other hand, has a more limited set of extensions and integrations available.

4. Community Support: Log4j has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of users and contributors. This translates into better community support, more active development, and a wealth of resources and documentation available. Zap, although growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources.

5. Logging Levels and Hierarchies: Log4j has a more comprehensive set of logging levels, allowing for fine-grained control over log outputs. It also supports hierarchical loggers, enabling a flexible and scalable logging structure. Zap, on the other hand, offers a simpler set of logging levels and does not have built-in support for hierarchical logging.

6. License: Log4j is released under the Apache License, which is a permissive open-source license. This allows for greater flexibility in using and modifying the library. Zap, on the other hand, is released under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which may have more restrictions in terms of usage and redistribution.

In Summary, Log4j offers more configuration flexibility, better performance, greater extensibility and community support, comprehensive logging levels and hierarchies, and a permissive open-source license compared to Zap.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More

What is Log4j?

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

What is Zap?

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Log4j?
What companies use Zap?
See which teams inside your own company are using Log4j or Zap.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Log4j?
What tools integrate with Zap?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Log4j and Zap?
SLF4J
It is a simple Logging Facade for Java (SLF4J) serves as a simple facade or abstraction for various logging frameworks allowing the end user to plug in the desired logging framework at deployment time.
Logback
It is intended as a successor to the popular log4j project. It is divided into three modules, logback-core, logback-classic and logback-access. The logback-core module lays the groundwork for the other two modules, logback-classic natively implements the SLF4J API so that you can readily switch back and forth between logback and other logging frameworks and logback-access module integrates with Servlet containers, such as Tomcat and Jetty, to provide HTTP-access log functionality.
Logstash
Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.
Loki
Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.
Bunyan
It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)
See all alternatives