StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Lumen vs Silex

Lumen vs Silex

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Silex
Silex
Stacks36
Followers33
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.6K
Forks710
Lumen
Lumen
Stacks429
Followers673
Votes161
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks992

Lumen vs Silex: What are the differences?

Comparison between Lumen and Silex

Lumen and Silex are both micro-frameworks built on top of their respective full-stack frameworks Laravel and Symfony. While both frameworks serve a similar purpose, they do have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Performance: Lumen is known for its speed and is optimized for performance, making it a great choice for building high-performance microservices or APIs. Silex, on the other hand, is not as lightweight as Lumen and may not be as performant in certain situations.

  2. Community Support: Lumen benefits from being part of the Laravel ecosystem, which has a large and active community. This means that there are plenty of resources, tutorials, and community support available for Lumen developers. Silex, although it has a strong community, might not have the same level of support and resources as Lumen due to its smaller user base.

  3. Flexibility: Lumen is designed to be a lightweight micro-framework, focusing primarily on building APIs and microservices. It provides a slimmed-down version of Laravel with stripped-down features and components. Silex, on the other hand, is more flexible and can be used for building both small and medium-sized applications with more complex requirements. It offers a wide range of features and can handle a variety of use cases.

  4. Routing: Lumen uses a simplified routing system, making it easy to define routes and endpoints for APIs. It provides a more straightforward and streamlined approach to routing. Silex, while it also has a routing component, offers more advanced routing capabilities and is better suited for applications with complex routing requirements.

  5. Testing: Lumen provides built-in support for testing, making it easy to write unit tests and perform integration testing. It includes tools and helpers specifically designed for testing APIs. Silex also supports testing, but it may require additional setup and configuration compared to Lumen.

  6. Scalability: Lumen's lightweight design and focus on performance make it a good choice for scalable applications. It is well-suited for handling a large number of requests or serving multiple microservices. Silex, while still scalable, may not offer the same level of performance and scalability as Lumen in highly demanding scenarios.

In summary, Lumen excels in performance, community support, and simplicity, making it a great choice for building high-performance microservices or APIs. Silex, on the other hand, offers more flexibility, advanced routing capabilities, and a wider range of features, making it suitable for a variety of applications with more complex requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Silex
Silex
Lumen
Lumen

It is built on the shoulders of Symfony and Pimple and also inspired by sinatra. It has an extension system based around the Pimple micro service-container that makes it even easier to tie in third party libraries.

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Concise API;Extensible;Testable;Fast;Simple;Easy to use
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.6K
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
710
GitHub Forks
992
Stacks
36
Stacks
429
Followers
33
Followers
673
Votes
0
Votes
161
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 38
    API
  • 28
    Microframework
  • 19
    MVC
  • 16
    PHP
  • 12
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Not fast
  • 2
    PHP
  • 1
    Not fast with MongoDB
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Silex, Lumen?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase