StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. LXC vs VirtualBox

LXC vs VirtualBox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Stacks31.1K
Followers25.6K
Votes1.1K
LXC
LXC
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes19
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.2K

LXC vs VirtualBox: What are the differences?

Key Differences between LXC and VirtualBox

Introduction:

LXC (Linux Containers) and VirtualBox are both used for virtualization, but they have several key differences. Here, we will discuss six specific differences between LXC and VirtualBox.

  1. Resource Utilization: LXC provides lightweight virtualization by running containers directly on the host's kernel, which leads to better resource utilization compared to VirtualBox's full virtualization approach. LXC containers share the host's resources and only require minimal overhead, resulting in faster performance and efficient use of system resources.

  2. Isolation: LXC containers are less isolated from the host system compared to VirtualBox virtual machines. LXC containers share the host's kernel and some resources, which allows for easier communication between containers and the host. VirtualBox virtual machines, on the other hand, are fully isolated from the host system, providing a higher level of security and stability.

  3. Operating System Support: LXC primarily focuses on Linux-based operating systems, as it relies on the host's kernel. It allows for seamless containerization of Linux applications and services. In contrast, VirtualBox supports a wide range of operating systems, including various versions of Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it more versatile for running different virtual machines.

  4. Snapshot and Cloning: VirtualBox excels in providing snapshot and cloning capabilities compared to LXC. VirtualBox allows users to take snapshots of a virtual machine's state at a particular point in time, making it easier to revert or branch off from a specific configuration. LXC, on the other hand, lacks built-in snapshot functionalities, making it more challenging to create and manage container snapshots.

  5. GUI Interface: VirtualBox comes with a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the management of virtual machines. Users can easily create, configure, and monitor virtual machines through the intuitive interface. LXC, on the contrary, primarily relies on command-line tools for container management, requiring users to have a good understanding of the command line.

  6. Performance: LXC exhibits better performance compared to VirtualBox due to its lightweight nature. LXC containers have lower overhead and faster startup times, allowing for improved responsiveness and quicker application deployment. VirtualBox, being a full virtualization solution, incurs more overhead, resulting in slightly slower performance compared to LXC.

In Summary, LXC provides lightweight virtualization with better resource utilization and Linux-focused containerization, while VirtualBox offers more extensive operating system support, advanced snapshot capabilities, a GUI interface, and broader isolation from the host system.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VirtualBox
VirtualBox
LXC
LXC

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

Portability;No hardware virtualization required;Guest Additions: shared folders, seamless windows, 3D virtualization;Great hardware support;Multigeneration branched snapshots;VM groups;Clean architecture; unprecedented modularity;Remote machine display
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
31.1K
Stacks
116
Followers
25.6K
Followers
223
Votes
1.1K
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 358
    Free
  • 231
    Easy
  • 169
    Default for vagrant
  • 110
    Fast
  • 73
    Starts quickly
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Good security
  • 3
    Simple and powerful
  • 2
    LGPL

What are some alternatives to VirtualBox, LXC?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

rkt

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana