StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cluster Management
  5. LXD vs Nomad

LXD vs Nomad

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nomad
Nomad
Stacks256
Followers344
Votes32
GitHub Stars15.9K
Forks2.0K
LXD
LXD
Stacks104
Followers194
Votes68

LXD vs Nomad: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Key differences between LXD and Nomad are outlined below:

1. **Containerization vs. Orchestration**: LXD focuses on containerization, providing a lightweight virtualization solution with a strong emphasis on performance and security. On the other hand, Nomad is an orchestrator that focuses on deploying and managing applications across a cluster of machines.
   
2. **Scope of Management**: LXD is primarily designed for managing system containers on a single host, providing a clean and simple way to run multiple isolated Linux systems on a single Linux instance. In contrast, Nomad is designed for managing large-scale, distributed applications and microservices across a cluster of servers, offering capabilities for scheduling, scaling, and updating applications.

3. **Use Cases**: LXD is suitable for scenarios where you need lightweight, secure containers for development, testing, or hosting applications that require isolated environments. Nomad is better suited for deploying and managing complex, multi-tier applications that require orchestration, automation, and scalability across a dynamic infrastructure.

4. **Resource Utilization**: LXD provides lightweight containers that share the host kernel, resulting in minimal resource overhead, making it efficient for running multiple containers on a single machine. Nomad, on the other hand, uses a client-server architecture to manage applications across a cluster, allowing for efficient resource allocation and utilization at scale.

5. **Community and Ecosystem**: LXD is developed and maintained by Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, with a focus on integrating seamlessly with Ubuntu systems. Nomad is an open-source project by HashiCorp, which has a vibrant community and ecosystem around its various tools for DevOps and infrastructure management, providing extensive support and integrations.

6. **High Availability and Failover**: Nomad comes with built-in support for high availability features like task rescheduling, automated failover, and load balancing to ensure continuous operation and availability of applications even in the face of server failures. Whereas LXD, being focused on containerization, does not offer built-in high availability features and relies on external tools or configurations for achieving HA.

In Summary, LXD focuses on containerization for system isolation on a single host, while Nomad is an orchestrator designed for managing complex applications across a cluster with automation and scalability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nomad, LXD

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nomad
Nomad
LXD
LXD

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Handles the scheduling and upgrading of the applications over time; With built-in dry-run execution, Nomad shows what scheduling decisions it will take before it takes them. Operators can approve or deny these changes to create a safe and reproducible workflow; Nomad runs applications and ensures they keep running in failure scenarios. In addition to long-running services, Nomad can schedule batch jobs, distributed cron jobs, and parameterized jobs; Stream logs, send signals, and interact with the file system of scheduled applications. These operator-friendly commands bring the familiar debugging tools to a scheduled world
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
256
Stacks
104
Followers
344
Followers
194
Votes
32
Votes
68
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Built in Consul integration
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Bult-in Vault integration
  • 3
    Built-in federation support
  • 2
    Self-healing
Cons
  • 3
    Easy to start with
  • 1
    HCL language for configuration, an unpopular DSL
  • 1
    Small comunity
Pros
  • 10
    More simple
  • 8
    Open Source
  • 8
    API
  • 8
    Best
  • 7
    Cluster
Integrations
Consul
Consul
Docker
Docker
Vault
Vault
LXC
LXC

What are some alternatives to Nomad, LXD?

Docker

Docker

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

rkt

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Mesosphere

Mesosphere

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

YARN Hadoop

YARN Hadoop

Its fundamental idea is to split up the functionalities of resource management and job scheduling/monitoring into separate daemons. The idea is to have a global ResourceManager (RM) and per-application ApplicationMaster (AM).

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana