Macaron vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
Developers describe Macaron as "A high productive and modular web framework in Go". Macaron is a modular web framework for Go with middlewares that allow you to easily plugin/unplugin features for your Macaron applications. On the other hand, Phalcon is detailed as "Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP". Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
Macaron and Phalcon belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.
Macaron and Phalcon are both open source tools. Phalcon with 9.74K GitHub stars and 1.78K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Macaron with 2.78K GitHub stars and 247 GitHub forks.
What is Macaron?
What is Phalcon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Macaron?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Macaron?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
'm a professional web developer from Vietnam with B.S Physics and Engineering. I'm a Phalcon enthusiast as Opensource. In free time, I was support on forum Phalcon also my forum and contribution core Phalcon.
I think precompiled PHP is the way to go. It saves CPU cycles, RAM and overall I/O. It saves money too. Smaller requirements = smaller bills.
I've tried symfony and zend. Phalcon was easiest to use.