StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Spark vs MariaDB

Apache Spark vs MariaDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MariaDB
MariaDB
Stacks16.5K
Followers12.8K
Votes468
GitHub Stars6.6K
Forks1.9K
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Stacks3.1K
Followers3.5K
Votes140
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks28.9K

Apache Spark vs MariaDB: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Spark and MariaDB are both popular technologies used in the field of big data processing and data management. However, they differ in several key aspects. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Apache Spark and MariaDB.

  1. Data Processing Paradigm: One of the major differences between Apache Spark and MariaDB lies in their data processing paradigms. Apache Spark is built on the concept of distributed computing and uses a cluster computing framework for processing large volumes of data in parallel. It supports a variety of data processing tasks such as batch processing, iterative algorithms, and real-time streaming. On the other hand, MariaDB is a traditional relational database management system (RDBMS) that follows the SQL-based processing paradigm. It excels in handling structured data and provides ACID compliance for transactional operations.

  2. Data Storage: Another significant difference between Apache Spark and MariaDB is their approach to data storage. Apache Spark does not provide its own storage system but instead relies on external storage systems such as HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System), Amazon S3, or other cloud-based storage options. It stores data in a distributed manner across multiple nodes in the cluster. In contrast, MariaDB has its own storage engine, which is optimized for traditional relational database storage. It stores data in a structured format within tables and supports various indexing and data retrieval mechanisms.

  3. Data Processing Speed: Apache Spark is well-known for its high-speed data processing capabilities. It achieves this through its in-memory computing model, which allows it to cache and process data in memory, avoiding the need for expensive disk I/O operations. Spark offers significant performance improvements for iterative algorithms and complex operations by keeping data in memory throughout the processing pipeline. MariaDB, although capable of handling large datasets, typically relies on disk-based storage and does not provide the same level of in-memory processing capabilities as Apache Spark.

  4. Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Apache Spark has a clear advantage over MariaDB. Spark is designed to handle extremely large datasets and can scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. It distributes the data across multiple nodes in the cluster and parallelizes the processing, allowing it to handle big data workloads with ease. MariaDB, on the other hand, can also scale horizontally, but it may require more effort and optimization to achieve the same level of scalability as Spark.

  5. Data Processing Flexibility: Apache Spark provides a wide range of libraries and APIs that enable it to perform various data processing tasks, including machine learning, graph processing, and real-time streaming. Spark's flexible architecture allows developers to write complex data processing workflows and algorithms using high-level APIs such as Spark SQL, Spark Streaming, MLlib, and GraphX. In contrast, MariaDB primarily focuses on traditional relational database operations and does not provide the same level of flexibility for advanced data processing tasks.

  6. Data Integration: Apache Spark supports seamless integration with various data sources and formats, making it suitable for data pipelines that require accessing and processing data from multiple sources. It provides connectors for popular databases, file systems, and data formats, allowing users to easily incorporate different data sources into their Spark workloads. MariaDB, being a relational database, is more suitable for scenarios where the data is primarily stored and accessed from the database itself, rather than integrating with diverse external data sources.

In summary, Apache Spark and MariaDB differ in their data processing paradigms, data storage approaches, processing speed, scalability, flexibility, and data integration capabilities. While Spark excels in distributed computing, in-memory processing, and handling big data workloads, MariaDB focuses on traditional relational database management and data integrity. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements of the application and the nature of the data being processed.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MariaDB, Apache Spark

Maxim
Maxim

student at USI

Aug 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsMongooseMongoosePostgreSQLPostgreSQL

Hi all. I am an informatics student, and I need to realise a simple website for my friend. I am planning to realise the website using Node.js and Mongoose, since I have already done a project using these technologies. I also know SQL, and I have used PostgreSQL and MySQL previously.

The website will show a possible travel destination and local transportation. The database is used to store information about traveling, so only admin will manage the content (especially photos). While clients will see the content uploaded by the admin. I am planning to use Mongoose because it is very simple and efficient for this project. Please give me your opinion about this choice.

321k views321k
Comments
Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs advice

We actually use both Mongo and SQL databases in production. Mongo excels in both speed and developer friendliness when it comes to geospatial data and queries on the geospatial data, but we also like ACID compliance hence most of our other data (except on-site logs) are stored in a SQL Database (MariaDB for now)

582k views582k
Comments
Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MariaDB
MariaDB
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Replication;Insert Delayed;Events;Dynamic;Columns;Full-text;Search;GIS;Locale;Settings;subqueries;Timezones;Triggers;XML;Functions;Views;SSL;Show Profile
Run programs up to 100x faster than Hadoop MapReduce in memory, or 10x faster on disk;Write applications quickly in Java, Scala or Python;Combine SQL, streaming, and complex analytics;Spark runs on Hadoop, Mesos, standalone, or in the cloud. It can access diverse data sources including HDFS, Cassandra, HBase, S3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.6K
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
28.9K
Stacks
16.5K
Stacks
3.1K
Followers
12.8K
Followers
3.5K
Votes
468
Votes
140
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 149
    Drop-in mysql replacement
  • 100
    Great performance
  • 74
    Open source
  • 55
    Free
  • 44
    Easy setup
Pros
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
Cons
  • 4
    Speed

What are some alternatives to MariaDB, Apache Spark?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase