StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Marko vs Vue.js

Marko vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K
Marko
Marko
Stacks29
Followers49
Votes40
GitHub Stars13.9K
Forks656

Marko vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Marko and Vue.js are both popular frameworks used for building web applications. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Marko and Vue.js.

  1. Template Syntax: Marko uses a concise, HTML-based syntax for its templates. This allows developers to write templates that closely resemble HTML, making it easy to read and understand. On the other hand, Vue.js uses a more JavaScript-centric syntax, allowing developers to write templates using JavaScript expressions and directives.

  2. Data Binding: In Marko, data binding is handled using a declarative syntax. Developers can simply bind data to elements using attributes, and Marko takes care of updating the view when the data changes. Vue.js, on the other hand, uses a more reactive approach to data binding. It uses a virtual DOM and an efficient diffing algorithm to update the view whenever the underlying data changes.

  3. Component System: Both Marko and Vue.js have a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable components. However, Marko's component system is more lightweight and less opinionated compared to Vue.js. Marko components are plain JavaScript objects, while Vue.js components have a more complex structure with lifecycle hooks, computed properties, and more.

  4. Performance: Marko is known for its exceptional performance. It uses a highly optimized rendering engine that minimizes the number of DOM updates required. This makes Marko a great choice for applications that require high performance. Vue.js also performs well, but it may not be as efficient as Marko in certain scenarios due to its more flexible and feature-rich nature.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Vue.js has a larger ecosystem and community compared to Marko. Vue.js has a rich set of plugins, libraries, and tools that are actively maintained by a large community of developers. This makes it easier to find solutions and resources when working with Vue.js. Marko, on the other hand, has a smaller but growing community.

  6. Learning Curve: Vue.js has a gentle learning curve, especially for developers with prior experience in JavaScript and HTML. Its syntax and concepts are easy to grasp, making it accessible to beginners. Marko, while still beginner-friendly, has a steeper learning curve compared to Vue.js. Its syntax and concepts may take some time to get used to, especially for developers new to the framework.

In summary, Marko and Vue.js differ in terms of their template syntax, data binding approach, component system, performance, ecosystem and community, and the learning curve. While Marko is known for its performance and simplicity, Vue.js has a larger ecosystem and a more beginner-friendly approach. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vue.js, Marko

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

It was easier to find people who've worked on React than Vue. Angular did not have this problem, but seemed way too bloated compared to React. Angular also brings in restrictions working within their MVC framework. React on the other hand only handles the view/rendering part and rest of the control is left to the developers. React has a very active community, support and has lots of ready-to-use plugins/libraries available.

683k views683k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vue.js
Vue.js
Marko
Marko

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Extremely fast; Streaming and async rendering; Progressive HTML rendering; Custom tags; Compiles to readable CommonJS modules; Server-side and client-side rendering; Use Marko with any web framework, including: Express, Koa, Hapi; Syntax highlighting in popular editors and IDEs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Stars
13.9K
GitHub Forks
33.8K
GitHub Forks
656
Stacks
55.5K
Stacks
29
Followers
44.7K
Followers
49
Votes
1.6K
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
Pros
  • 6
    Simplicity
  • 5
    No JSX
  • 5
    Better than React, Vue, etc
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Performance
Cons
  • 1
    Extensibility
  • 1
    Unit test
  • 1
    Mobile native

What are some alternatives to Vue.js, Marko?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase