StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Materialize

Material Design for Angular vs Materialize

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K

Material Design for Angular vs Materialize: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown provides a comparison between Material Design for Angular and Materialize, focusing on key differences.

1. **Development Framework**:
Material Design for Angular is specifically built for Angular applications, providing a set of Angular components that follow Google's Material Design guidelines. Materialize, on the other hand, is a CSS framework that is not limited to a specific JavaScript framework but can be used with any front-end framework or library.

2. **Community Support**:
Material Design for Angular has strong community support from the Angular community as well as Google developers, ensuring regular updates and detailed documentation. Materialize also has a supportive community; however, it may not be as extensive or active as the Material Design for Angular community.

3. **Integration with Angular Features**:
Material Design for Angular seamlessly integrates with Angular features and concepts, making it easier for Angular developers to work with. Materialize, being a CSS framework, does not offer the same level of integration with Angular-specific features, requiring additional effort for Angular developers to implement.

4. **Customization Options**:
Material Design for Angular offers a wide range of customization options through Angular's styling capabilities and theming support, allowing developers to create unique designs easily. Materialize also provides customization options but may not be as extensive or flexible as Material Design for Angular.

5. **Performance and Optimization**:
Material Design for Angular is optimized for Angular applications, offering performance improvements tailored for Angular's architecture. Materialize, being a CSS framework, may not have the same level of optimization specifically designed for Angular applications, potentially leading to performance bottlenecks in complex Angular projects.

6. **Component Library**:
Material Design for Angular provides a rich library of pre-built Angular components that adhere to Material Design principles, helping developers quickly build consistent and user-friendly interfaces. Materialize, while offering a variety of UI components, may not have the same level of specificity in terms of adherence to Material Design guidelines as Material Design for Angular.

In Summary, the key differences between Material Design for Angular and Materialize include their integration with development frameworks, community support, customization options, performance optimization, and component libraries, with Material Design for Angular tailored specifically for Angular applications and offering a more seamless integration with Angular features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Materialize
Materialize

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

A CSS Framework based on material design.

-
Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
698
Followers
9.6K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
522
Votes
557
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Materialize?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Vuetify

Vuetify

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase