StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Milligram

Material Design for Angular vs Milligram

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Milligram
Milligram
Stacks38
Followers81
Votes50
GitHub Stars10.2K
Forks738

Material Design for Angular vs Milligram: What are the differences?

# Introduction

The Key differences between Material Design for Angular and Milligram are as follows:

1. **Component Library Integration**: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of pre-built components, such as buttons, cards, and menus, that follow Google's Material Design guidelines. On the other hand, Milligram focuses more on providing a minimalistic CSS framework without pre-designed components, allowing developers more flexibility in customizing their designs.

2. **Flexibility vs. Opinionated Design**: Material Design for Angular comes with a more opinionated design approach, offering a consistent look and feel based on Material Design principles. In contrast, Milligram adopts a more flexible approach, giving developers the freedom to create their own design system without being constrained by predefined styles.

3. **Browser Support**: Material Design for Angular ensures better cross-browser compatibility as it is specifically built for Angular applications. Milligram, being a lightweight CSS framework, may lack some advanced features and might require more manual tweaking to achieve consistent rendering across different browsers.

4. **UI Customization**: With Material Design for Angular, UI customization is often easier due to the pre-built components and theming capabilities provided by Angular Material. Milligram, although lightweight, may require more effort in customizing the UI since it lacks predefined components and theming options.

5. **Community Support**: Material Design for Angular, being a part of the Angular ecosystem, has a larger community that actively contributes to its development, providing more resources, tutorials, and support. Milligram, while popular for its minimalist design approach, may have a smaller community following, resulting in fewer resources and community-driven updates.

6. **Learning Curve**: Material Design for Angular's learning curve may be steeper for beginners due to its opinionated design system and the intricacies of Angular integration. In contrast, Milligram's simplicity and lightweight nature make it easier for developers to grasp and start using quickly, especially for projects with basic design requirements.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular offers a pre-built component library with opinionated design choices and better browser support, while Milligram focuses on flexibility, minimalism, and simplicity with less community support and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Milligram
Milligram

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Milligram provides a minimal setup of styles for a fast and clean starting point. Specially designed for better performance and higher productivity with fewer properties to reset resulting in cleaner code.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
10.2K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
738
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
38
Followers
9.6K
Followers
81
Votes
522
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Pros
  • 7
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Weightless
  • 6
    Flexbox
  • 4
    Consistent
  • 4
    Responsiveness
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Milligram?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase