StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs sauron (framework)

Material Design for Angular vs sauron (framework)

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
sauron (framework)
sauron (framework)
Stacks2
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks61

Material Design for Angular vs sauron (framework): What are the differences?

## Introduction
Material Design for Angular and Sauron are popular frameworks for building web applications. Here are the key differences between the two frameworks:

1. **Design Philosophy**: Material Design for Angular follows Google's Material Design guidelines, focusing on clean, minimalistic design elements and interactions inspired by the physical world. In contrast, Sauron emphasizes speed and efficiency, with a focus on performance optimization and lightweight code.
2. **Component Library**: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of pre-built components like buttons, cards, and sliders following the Material Design principles. On the other hand, Sauron offers a more customizable approach, allowing developers to create their own components tailored to their specific requirements.
3. **Integration with Angular**: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed to work seamlessly with the Angular framework, providing ready-to-use Angular components and services. Sauron, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic, making it suitable for use with a variety of frontend frameworks and libraries.
4. **Theming and Styling**: Material Design for Angular offers a robust theming system that allows easy customization of colors, typography, and other design elements to match the branding requirements. In contrast, Sauron provides a more minimalist styling approach, focusing on functional design rather than extensive theming options.
5. **Community and Support**: Material Design for Angular has a large community of developers and resources available, including official documentation and support from Google. Sauron, being a relatively newer framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources for developers to rely on for assistance.
6. **Learning Curve**: Due to its adherence to Material Design principles and Angular integration, Material Design for Angular may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to the framework or design guidelines. Sauron, with its lightweight and customizable approach, may be easier for developers to start working with and customize as needed.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular is focused on adherence to Google's Material Design guidelines and seamless integration with Angular, while Sauron prioritizes performance optimization, customization, and framework flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
sauron (framework)
sauron (framework)

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

With the goal to closely adhere to The Elm Architecture. As with elm, sauron doesn't use macros to provide the view, instead it just uses plain Rust function calls to construct the view.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
61
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
2
Followers
9.6K
Followers
10
Votes
522
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Rust
Rust
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, sauron (framework)?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase