StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs tachyons

Material Design for Angular vs tachyons

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
tachyons
tachyons
Stacks70
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks675

Material Design for Angular vs tachyons: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material Design for Angular and Tachyons are both popular front-end frameworks used for designing web applications. However, they have distinct differences in terms of their design philosophy and approach to styling.

  1. Design Principles: Material Design for Angular follows Google's Material Design principles, which emphasize tactile realism, responsive interaction, and meaningful motion. On the other hand, Tachyons focuses on functional CSS with an emphasis on utility classes for rapid prototyping.

  2. Component Library: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive library of pre-built components such as buttons, cards, and modals that follow the Material Design guidelines. In contrast, Tachyons does not provide pre-built components but instead offers a set of utility classes for styling elements directly.

  3. Customization Options: Material Design for Angular allows for customization of pre-built components through theming and styling options. In contrast, Tachyons promotes a more standardized approach to styling with limited customization options to maintain consistency.

  4. Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular requires familiarity with the Material Design guidelines and Angular framework, making it more suitable for developers already comfortable with Angular. Tachyons, with its focus on atomic CSS classes, has a relatively low learning curve and is easy to implement for developers new to front-end development.

  5. Size and Performance: Tachyons is known for its lightweight nature, with a minified CSS file size of around 14kb, promoting faster loading times and better performance. Material Design for Angular, due to its extensive component library and theming options, can result in larger CSS file sizes and potentially slower performance.

  6. Ecosystem and Support: Material Design for Angular benefits from the larger Angular ecosystem and community support, making it easier to find resources and solutions to common issues. Tachyons, while well-documented, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and customization.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular and Tachyons differ in their design principles, component libraries, customization options, learning curve, size and performance, as well as ecosystem and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
tachyons
tachyons

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Create fast loading, highly readable, and 100% responsive interfaces with as little CSS as possible.

-
Mobile-first css architecture; 490 accessible color combinations; 8px baseline grid;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
675
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
70
Followers
9.6K
Followers
79
Votes
522
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
PostCSS
PostCSS
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, tachyons?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase