StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Clarity Design System vs Material Design for Angular

Clarity Design System vs Material Design for Angular

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Clarity Design System
Clarity Design System
Stacks26
Followers95
Votes25

Clarity Design System vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Clarity Design System and Material Design for Angular are two popular design systems used for building user interfaces in web applications. Although they both provide a set of pre-built components and guidelines for creating visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces, there are key differences between the two.
  1. Design Philosophy: Clarity Design System follows a minimalistic and functional design philosophy, focusing on simplicity and efficiency in user interactions. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular embraces a more expressive and animated design approach, emphasizing visual feedback and engaging user experiences.

  2. Styling: Clarity Design System offers a clean and minimalist design with a predominantly monochromatic color palette. It focuses on providing a consistent visual language with straightforward typography and layout. In contrast, Material Design for Angular offers a more vibrant and dynamic color system, along with a range of decorative elements like shadows, gradients, and animations.

  3. Component Set: Clarity Design System offers a comprehensive set of UI components, including data grids, forms, modals, navigation, and more. It emphasizes functionality and ease of use, making complex data manipulation tasks more manageable. In comparison, Material Design for Angular provides a rich collection of components with an emphasis on visual effects and animations, allowing for more visually appealing and interactive user interfaces.

  4. Accessibility: Clarity Design System places a strong emphasis on accessibility, providing robust support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and other assistive technologies. It ensures that the UI components are usable and perceivable by a wide range of users, including those with disabilities. Material Design for Angular also pays attention to accessibility but may not be as comprehensive as Clarity in terms of accessibility features.

  5. Community Support: Material Design for Angular has a larger and more active community of developers and designers, contributing to its popularity and increased availability of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries. Clarity Design System, although growing, has a smaller community and a more limited pool of resources.

  6. Documentation: Material Design for Angular has extensive and well-maintained documentation, providing detailed explanations, guidelines, and examples for using its components and following its design principles. Clarity Design System also has documentation, but it may not be as extensive and comprehensive as the Material Design documentation.

In Summary, Clarity Design System and Material Design for Angular differ in design philosophy, styling, component set, accessibility focus, community support, and documentation availability. These differences influence the visual aesthetics, user interactions, and development experience when using either design system in a web application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Clarity Design System
Clarity Design System

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

UX guidelines, HTML/CSS framework, and Angular components working together to craft exceptional experiences. Start building with our HTML/CSS framework and rapidly go from prototype to production.

-
Product-based;Rapid development;Reliable;Rapidly go from prototype to production; A set of data-bound and performant components on top of Angular to add interactivity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
26
Followers
9.6K
Followers
95
Votes
522
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 51
    Free
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Pros
  • 4
    Angular
  • 3
    CSS framework
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    UI components
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular CLI
Angular CLI
Angular
Angular
AngularJS
AngularJS
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Clarity Design System?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase