StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design Lite vs sauron (framework)

Material Design Lite vs sauron (framework)

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite
Stacks697
Followers394
Votes62
GitHub Stars32.2K
Forks5.0K
sauron (framework)
sauron (framework)
Stacks2
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks61

Material Design Lite vs sauron (framework): What are the differences?

Introduction:

Material Design Lite (MDL) and Sauron are two popular design frameworks used in web development to create visually appealing and responsive websites. These frameworks provide a set of pre-designed components and styles that help developers easily create modern user interfaces.

  1. Design Philosophy: Material Design Lite follows Google's Material Design principles, which focus on clean, minimalistic design with a focus on grid-based layouts, depth, and shadow effects. On the other hand, Sauron emphasizes simplicity and performance, providing a lightweight and minimalistic framework without any specific design philosophy.

  2. Component Library: Material Design Lite offers a comprehensive library of ready-to-use components such as buttons, cards, navigation drawers, and more, following the Material Design guidelines. Sauron, on the other hand, has a smaller set of components focusing on essential elements like grids, typography, and forms, allowing for greater customization by developers.

  3. Customization Options: Material Design Lite provides a wide range of customization options through themes, colors, and typography settings, allowing developers to easily adapt the design to match their branding. In contrast, Sauron offers less built-in customization but focuses on providing a flexible foundation for developers to extend and customize components as needed.

  4. Dependencies: Material Design Lite requires additional JavaScript and CSS files to be included in the project to utilize its components and styles fully. Sauron, on the other hand, has minimal dependencies and aims to keep the framework lightweight by avoiding unnecessary bloat, resulting in faster load times and better performance.

  5. Community Support: Material Design Lite has a larger community base due to its association with Google's Material Design, making it easier to find tutorials, resources, and support online. Sauron, being a newer and less widely adopted framework, may have a smaller community but offers a more niche and focused approach to web design and development.

In Summary, Material Design Lite emphasizes Material Design principles with a comprehensive component library and extensive customization options, while Sauron focuses on simplicity, performance, and flexibility with minimal dependencies and a smaller community base.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design Lite
Material Design Lite
sauron (framework)
sauron (framework)

Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.

With the goal to closely adhere to The Elm Architecture. As with elm, sauron doesn't use macros to provide the view, instead it just uses plain Rust function calls to construct the view.

Blog template;Dashboard template;Text heavy webpage template; Stand alone article template;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
32.2K
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
61
Stacks
697
Stacks
2
Followers
394
Followers
10
Votes
62
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Material Design straight from the original creators
  • 11
    Based on bem philosophy
  • 9
    Nice animations
  • 7
    SCSS
  • 5
    Simple Material Design
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Rust
Rust
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Material Design Lite, sauron (framework)?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase