Material Design vs Material Design Lite

Overview

Material Design Lite

Stacks697

Followers394

Votes62

GitHub Stars32.2K

Forks5.0K

Material Design

Stacks594

Followers890

Votes14

Material Design vs Material Design Lite: What are the differences?

Purpose: Material Design is a comprehensive design system that covers various platforms such as Android, iOS, and the web, providing a cohesive visual language for all. On the other hand, Material Design Lite is primarily focused on the web, offering web developers a set of guidelines and components to create websites with a Material Design look and feel.
Components: Material Design includes a wide range of components, animations, and transitions to be used across different platforms, offering a rich user experience. In contrast, Material Design Lite features a smaller set of components tailored specifically for web development, providing a more lightweight option compared to the full Material Design system.
Integration: Material Design can be seamlessly integrated into Android and iOS apps as well as web applications, ensuring a consistent design language across platforms. Material Design Lite, however, is specifically designed for web developers and integrates easily with existing websites, allowing for the quick adoption of Material Design principles on the web.
Customization: While Material Design offers a comprehensive set of guidelines and components that can be customized to fit specific needs, Material Design Lite provides a more limited range of customization options, focusing on simplicity and ease of use for web developers.
Performance: Material Design Lite is optimized for performance on the web, offering a lightweight framework that helps in reducing page load times and improving overall website performance. In contrast, Material Design, with its broader scope and more extensive set of features, may require more resources and have a potentially higher impact on performance.
Community Support: Material Design has a larger community and ecosystem, with more resources, documentation, and support available for developers looking to implement the design system across different platforms. Material Design Lite, being a more specific tool for web development, has a smaller but dedicated community focused on web design and development.

In Summary, Material Design and Material Design Lite differ in their scope, components, integration, customization options, performance, and community support, catering to different needs in design and development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material Design Lite, Material Design

Ashish

Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software

Dec 29, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bootstrap

Material Design

Tailwind CSS

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

735k views735k

Comments

Raj

Jan 3, 2021

Review

Hi Ashish,

If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.

If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.

Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.

If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.

307k views307k

Comments

Ryan

Mar 11, 2021

Decided

Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.

We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.

We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's

220k views220k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material Design Lite	Material Design
Material Design Lite (MDL) lets you add a Material Design look and feel to your static content websites. It doesn't rely on any JavaScript frameworks or libraries. Optimized for cross-device use, gracefully degrades in older browsers, and offers an experience that is accessible from the get-go.	Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.
Blog template;Dashboard template;Text heavy webpage template; Stand alone article template;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 32.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 697	Stacks 594
Followers 394	Followers 890
Votes 62	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Material Design straight from the original creators 11 Based on bem philosophy 9 Nice animations 7 SCSS 5 Simple Material Design	Pros 5 They really set a new bar in design 4 An intuitive design 3 Simply, And Beautiful 2 Many great libraries 0 Composants Cons 2 Sometimes, it can hang the browser

What are some alternatives to Material Design Lite, Material Design?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Material Design vs Material Design Lite: What are the differences?

Purpose: Material Design is a comprehensive design system that covers various platforms such as Android, iOS, and the web, providing a cohesive visual language for all. On the other hand, Material Design Lite is primarily focused on the web, offering web developers a set of guidelines and components to create websites with a Material Design look and feel.
Components: Material Design includes a wide range of components, animations, and transitions to be used across different platforms, offering a rich user experience. In contrast, Material Design Lite features a smaller set of components tailored specifically for web development, providing a more lightweight option compared to the full Material Design system.
Integration: Material Design can be seamlessly integrated into Android and iOS apps as well as web applications, ensuring a consistent design language across platforms. Material Design Lite, however, is specifically designed for web developers and integrates easily with existing websites, allowing for the quick adoption of Material Design principles on the web.
Customization: While Material Design offers a comprehensive set of guidelines and components that can be customized to fit specific needs, Material Design Lite provides a more limited range of customization options, focusing on simplicity and ease of use for web developers.
Performance: Material Design Lite is optimized for performance on the web, offering a lightweight framework that helps in reducing page load times and improving overall website performance. In contrast, Material Design, with its broader scope and more extensive set of features, may require more resources and have a potentially higher impact on performance.
Community Support: Material Design has a larger community and ecosystem, with more resources, documentation, and support available for developers looking to implement the design system across different platforms. Material Design Lite, being a more specific tool for web development, has a smaller but dedicated community focused on web design and development.

Material Design vs Material Design Lite

Overview