Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design vs Vuetify: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Material Design and Vuetify are two popular design frameworks used for creating responsive web applications. While both frameworks aim to enhance user experience and aesthetics, they have key differences that developers need to be aware of.
1. **Design Language**: Material Design is a design language developed by Google, focusing on creating a clean, intuitive user interface with depth and realism through shadows and animations. On the other hand, Vuetify is a Vue.js framework that implements the Material Design guidelines but offers additional customization and theming possibilities.
2. **Component Library**: Material Design provides a comprehensive set of pre-built components such as buttons, cards, and navigation drawers to streamline development. Vuetify, on the other hand, extends these components by adding new ones like date pickers, data tables, and dialogs, allowing for more versatility in design.
3. **Integration with Vue.js**: Vuetify is specifically built for Vue.js, ensuring seamless integration and compatibility with Vue components, directives, and lifecycle hooks. Material Design, being a design language, is not limited to any particular JavaScript framework, making it more versatile but potentially requiring more effort to integrate with Vue.js.
4. **Theming and Customization**: Vuetify offers extensive theming capabilities, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of their applications with predefined themes or by creating custom themes. Material Design, while providing a basic color palette and typography guidelines, may require more manual customization for a unique design.
5. **Community and Support**: Material Design benefits from Google's resources and active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support for developers. Vuetify, being an open-source project with a growing community, also offers a range of resources but may have slightly less comprehensive support compared to Material Design.
6. **Performance and Bundle Size**: Vuetify, being a component library tailored for Vue.js, may result in a larger bundle size compared to manually implementing Material Design components. This could impact the performance of the application, especially for smaller projects or those with strict performance requirements.
In Summary, Material Design excels in providing a standardized design language with a strong community and versatile design options, while Vuetify offers enhanced customization, tight integration with Vue.js, and a growing collection of components for unique web applications. Developers should consider their specific project requirements when choosing between the two frameworks.
I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?
Any suggestion would be appreciated?
Hi Ashish,
If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.
If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.
Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.
If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.
I don't know about material design.
You would go with Bootstrap if you want to prototype / build something without bothering about the design at all and you are OK if everything looks kinda template-y, using bootstrap out of the box components.
Go with Tailwind if you need a sleek design, a user interface where building with components will be important (because tailwind strongly favors component-based UI), and you know you will need to extend the built-in classes with your own (because tailwind is very easy to extend)
I would personally recommend tailwind over bootstrap any day of the week.
Tailwind is great you don't have to mess with naming things and it is so much more flexible than the cookie cutter bootstrap, but I don't know about material UI. I recommend tailwind it's super simple to learn and has great code snippets.
Put simply, you should use Tailwind regardless. It is a great addition to whatever you use because it removes the hassle of writing CSS.
Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.
We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.
We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's
Pros of Material Design
- They really set a new bar in design5
- An intuitive design4
- Simply, And Beautiful3
- Many great libraries2
- Composants0
Pros of Vuetify
- Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs29
- Wide range of components and active development24
- Vue22
- New age components18
- Easy integration13
- Material Design11
- Nuxt.js10
- Open Source10
- Awesome Documentation6
- Awesome Component collection5
- Internationalization5
- Not tied to jQuery5
- Best use of vue slots you'll ever see4
- Not tied to jQuery2
- Treeshaking2
- Active Community2
- Responsiveness2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design
- Sometimes, it can hang the browser2
Cons of Vuetify
- It is heavy19
- Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)3
