StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design vs Vuetify

Material Design vs Vuetify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design
Material Design
Stacks594
Followers890
Votes14
Vuetify
Vuetify
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.8K
Votes170
GitHub Stars40.8K
Forks7.1K

Material Design vs Vuetify: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Material Design and Vuetify are two popular design frameworks used for creating responsive web applications. While both frameworks aim to enhance user experience and aesthetics, they have key differences that developers need to be aware of.

1. **Design Language**: Material Design is a design language developed by Google, focusing on creating a clean, intuitive user interface with depth and realism through shadows and animations. On the other hand, Vuetify is a Vue.js framework that implements the Material Design guidelines but offers additional customization and theming possibilities.

2. **Component Library**: Material Design provides a comprehensive set of pre-built components such as buttons, cards, and navigation drawers to streamline development. Vuetify, on the other hand, extends these components by adding new ones like date pickers, data tables, and dialogs, allowing for more versatility in design.

3. **Integration with Vue.js**: Vuetify is specifically built for Vue.js, ensuring seamless integration and compatibility with Vue components, directives, and lifecycle hooks. Material Design, being a design language, is not limited to any particular JavaScript framework, making it more versatile but potentially requiring more effort to integrate with Vue.js.

4. **Theming and Customization**: Vuetify offers extensive theming capabilities, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of their applications with predefined themes or by creating custom themes. Material Design, while providing a basic color palette and typography guidelines, may require more manual customization for a unique design.

5. **Community and Support**: Material Design benefits from Google's resources and active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support for developers. Vuetify, being an open-source project with a growing community, also offers a range of resources but may have slightly less comprehensive support compared to Material Design.

6. **Performance and Bundle Size**: Vuetify, being a component library tailored for Vue.js, may result in a larger bundle size compared to manually implementing Material Design components. This could impact the performance of the application, especially for smaller projects or those with strict performance requirements.

In Summary, Material Design excels in providing a standardized design language with a strong community and versatile design options, while Vuetify offers enhanced customization, tight integration with Vue.js, and a growing collection of components for unique web applications. Developers should consider their specific project requirements when choosing between the two frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material Design, Vuetify

Ashish
Ashish

Sr. UI Associate at Daffodil Software

Dec 29, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapMaterial DesignMaterial DesignTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am a bit confused when to choose Bootstrap vs Material Design or Tailwind CSS, and why? I mean, in which kind of projects we can work with bootstrap/Material/Tailwind CSS? If the design is made up on the grid, we prefer bootstrap, and if flat design, then material design. Similarly, when do we choose tailwind CSS?

Any suggestion would be appreciated?

735k views735k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Jan 3, 2021

Review

Hi Ashish,

If you need minimal work to be done from your end and like most of the components / design available out of the box - go with Bootstrap. This is the oldest and has the widest adoption and a whole range of components built out by others.

If you like Material design, this is a good choice too. Please note that Bootstrap also has a Material theme, though it is not as native.

Both of these above frameworks are bulky and has more than what you may need.

If you like to build micro-components in a elegant way, TailwindCSS is the way to go.

307k views307k
Comments
Ryan
Ryan

Mar 11, 2021

Decided

Ant Design offers the most components with JS and CSS taken care of. They look clean, professional, and usable.

We paired this with Bulma for making the containers and structure reactive. Bulma (for react) make it easy to just add a section, container, and content and have it work on all platforms.

We also use Geist UI, though not recognized by Stack share, for its simple and modern feel. Highly recommend Geist if you want modern components for complicated UI's

220k views220k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material Design
Material Design
Vuetify
Vuetify

Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
40.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.1K
Stacks
594
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
890
Followers
1.8K
Votes
14
Votes
170
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    They really set a new bar in design
  • 4
    An intuitive design
  • 3
    Simply, And Beautiful
  • 2
    Many great libraries
  • 0
    Composants
Cons
  • 2
    Sometimes, it can hang the browser
Pros
  • 29
    Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs
  • 24
    Wide range of components and active development
  • 22
    Vue
  • 18
    New age components
  • 13
    Easy integration
Cons
  • 19
    It is heavy
  • 3
    Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Material Design, Vuetify?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase