Materialize vs Sass

Overview

Sass

Stacks44.8K

Followers32.2K

Votes3.0K

GitHub Stars15.3K

Forks2.2K

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Materialize vs Sass: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, Materialize and Sass are two popular technologies that are commonly used for creating and designing websites. Materialize is a CSS framework that provides ready-to-use components and styles for building responsive websites. On the other hand, Sass is a preprocessor scripting language that allows developers to write more efficient and maintainable CSS code. While both Materialize and Sass are used for web development, there are key differences between the two.

1. Customization Flexibility:

Materialize offers a wide range of pre-built components and styles that can be easily implemented in a website. However, the customization options are limited to the provided options, and modifying the default styles can be challenging. On the other hand, Sass provides a high level of customization flexibility. Developers can easily modify variables and mixins, allowing for greater control over the styling of the website. This makes Sass a better choice when it comes to customization requirements.

2. Code Organization:

Materialize follows a modular approach where components are imported separately into the website code. This allows for easier management and organization of the codebase, especially in larger projects. Sass, on the other hand, is a language for writing CSS and does not have a specific code organization structure. It relies on the developer to organize the codebase efficiently. While this offers more flexibility, it can also lead to a more complex codebase if not properly organized.

3. Learning Curve:

Materialize provides a comprehensive documentation with examples, making it relatively easier for beginners to learn and implement. It follows a declarative syntax that is easier to understand and use. On the other hand, Sass requires some familiarity with CSS concepts and has a steeper learning curve compared to Materialize. It introduces new concepts like variables, mixins, and nesting, which can be challenging for beginners. However, once mastered, Sass offers more powerful and efficient CSS coding capabilities.

4. Compatibility:

Materialize is a CSS framework that can be used with any HTML files without any additional dependencies. It can be easily integrated into existing projects and is compatible with different browsers. On the other hand, Sass is a preprocessor that needs to be compiled into CSS before it can be used by the browser. This adds an extra step in the development process and requires a Sass compiler. While Sass offers additional features, it may not be suitable for projects that require simplicity and quick setup.

5. Community and Support:

Materialize has a large and active community of developers, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and support. It has a well-maintained codebase and regularly updated releases. Sass also has a strong community support, with a wide range of resources and libraries available. However, compared to Materialize, Sass has a smaller community, which means finding specific solutions or help for complex issues may be slightly more challenging.

6. Integration with Existing Workflows:

Materialize can be easily integrated into existing workflows and projects without much modification. It can be used alongside other CSS frameworks like Bootstrap, making it a versatile choice. Sass, on the other hand, requires a change in the development workflow as it needs to be compiled into CSS before being used. This may require additional tools or build processes to be set up, which may not be suitable for all development workflows.

**In Summary, Materialize offers ready-to-use components and limited customization options, while Sass provides greater customization flexibility with a steeper learning curve. Materialize is easier to learn and integrate, while Sass requires a compilation step and a change in the development workflow. The choice between Materialize and Sass depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sass, Materialize

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Sass

Stylus

PostCSS

Originally, I was going to start using @{Sass}|tool:1171| with Parcel, but then I learned about @{Stylus}|tool:1172|, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and @{PostCSS}|tool:3339|, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

547k views547k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sass	Materialize
Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.	A CSS Framework based on material design.
-	Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.3K	GitHub Stars 39.1K
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 44.8K	Stacks 698
Followers 32.2K	Followers 1.2K
Votes 3.0K	Votes 557
Pros & Cons
Pros 613 Variables 594 Mixins 466 Nested rules 410 Maintainable 300 Functions Cons 6 Needs to be compiled	Pros 102 Google material design 74 Easy to use 74 Responsive 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained

What are some alternatives to Sass, Materialize?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.