StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Materialize vs Simple Grid

Materialize vs Simple Grid

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
Simple Grid
Simple Grid
Stacks2
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars885
Forks118

Materialize vs Simple Grid: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Grid System**: Materialize uses a 12-column grid system, allowing for more flexibility and control over layout design. Simple Grid, on the other hand, uses a 1140px-wide grid system with 12 columns, providing a fixed width for the layout.
2. **Responsive Design**: Materialize offers built-in responsive design features such as responsive grids and helper classes for different screen sizes, making it easier to create mobile-friendly websites. Simple Grid focuses more on simplicity and does not offer as many built-in responsive design features.
3. **Component Library**: Materialize comes with a rich component library that includes pre-styled components like buttons, cards, and forms, making it easier to design websites quickly. Simple Grid is a lightweight grid system focused primarily on layout structure and does not include a built-in component library.
4. **Customization Options**: Materialize provides extensive customization options through SASS variables and a robust theming system, allowing developers to easily customize the appearance of their websites. Simple Grid is more limited in terms of customization options, as it is designed to be simple and lightweight.
5. **JavaScript Functionality**: Materialize includes a range of JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, providing interactive elements out of the box. Simple Grid does not offer built-in JavaScript functionality and leaves it up to developers to implement any interactive elements themselves.

In Summary, Materialize offers a more robust grid system, responsive design features, a rich component library, extensive customization options, and built-in JavaScript functionality compared to Simple Grid.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
Simple Grid
Simple Grid

A CSS Framework based on material design.

It is a 12-column, lightweight CSS grid to help you quickly build responsive websites. It's responsive, light and simple.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Simple;Responsive;Lightweight;CSS Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
118
Stacks
698
Stacks
2
Followers
1.2K
Followers
10
Votes
557
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Simple Grid?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase