StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Metro Bundler vs Parcel

Metro Bundler vs Parcel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Metro Bundler
Metro Bundler
Stacks13
Followers32
Votes0
Parcel
Parcel
Stacks874
Followers250
Votes18
GitHub Stars44.0K
Forks2.3K

Metro Bundler vs Parcel: What are the differences?

Metro Bundler vs Parcel

Metro Bundler and Parcel are two popular module bundlers used in web development. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between them.

1. **Configuration**: Metro Bundler requires minimal configuration, making it easier to set up and use for React Native projects. On the other hand, Parcel offers zero configuration by default, making it an excellent choice for quick prototyping and small projects without the need for extensive configuration.

2. **Bundling Process**: Metro Bundler uses a pre-configured set of rules and tools optimized for React Native applications, resulting in faster bundling times and efficient code splitting. In contrast, Parcel uses a more generalized approach, which may result in slightly slower bundling times but offers flexibility in handling various types of projects and setups.

3. **Tree-shaking**: Metro Bundler has built-in support for tree-shaking, a process of eliminating dead code from the production bundle to reduce its size. On the other hand, Parcel also supports tree-shaking but may require additional configuration or plugins to achieve optimal results.

4. **Code Splitting**: Metro Bundler provides out-of-the-box support for code splitting, allowing developers to split their code into smaller chunks that can be loaded on demand for better performance. Parcel also offers code splitting capabilities but may require more manual intervention or configuration settings to achieve the desired results.

5. **Dependency Management**: Metro Bundler has a strong focus on managing dependencies efficiently, with features like automatic resolution of peer dependencies and support for hoisting common modules. Parcel, on the other hand, simplifies dependency management by automatically resolving and bundling dependencies without the need for additional configurations.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Metro Bundler is specifically tailored for React Native projects and has a strong community backing with dedicated support for the framework. In contrast, Parcel has a broader ecosystem supporting various web technologies and tools, making it a versatile choice for different types of projects beyond React Native.

In Summary, Metro Bundler and Parcel offer distinct advantages in terms of configuration, bundling process, tree-shaking, code splitting, dependency management, and community support based on the specific requirements of the project. Developers can choose between them based on the nature and scale of their web development projects.```

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Metro Bundler
Metro Bundler
Parcel
Parcel

🚅 Fast: We aim for sub-second reload cycles, fast startup and quick bundling speeds. ⚖️ Scalable: Works with thousands of modules in a single application. ⚛️ Integrated: Supports every React Native project out of the box.

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

-
Blazing fast bundle times; Bundle all your assets; Automatic transforms; Zero config code splitting; Hot module replacement; Friendly error logging
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
44.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
13
Stacks
874
Followers
32
Followers
250
Votes
0
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 10
    Zero configuration
  • 8
    Built-in dev server with livereload
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of documentation
Integrations
React Native
React Native
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Metro Bundler, Parcel?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana