StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. State Management Library
  5. Microcall vs Zustand

Microcall vs Zustand

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zustand
Zustand
Stacks371
Followers157
Votes34
Microcall
Microcall
Stacks0
Followers0
Votes0

Microcall vs Zustand: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Microcall and Zustand:

1. **Architecture**: Microcall follows a more traditional Redux-like architecture with actions, reducers, and state contained in a central store, while Zustand has a simpler architecture with all state managed in individual stores and uses hooks for state management.
2. **Library Size**: Microcall is a larger library with more features and capabilities, making it suitable for complex state management scenarios, whereas Zustand is a lightweight library focused on simplicity and ease of use for smaller applications.
3. **Performance**: Zustand is known for its better performance due to its optimized re-renders and minimal overhead, while Microcall may have slightly higher overhead and may not be as performant for extremely large-scale applications.
4. **Ease of Use**: Zustand is designed to be more beginner-friendly and has a lower learning curve compared to Microcall, which may require more understanding of middleware, actions, and reducers for effective usage.
5. **Community Support**: Microcall has a larger and more established community with a wide range of resources and support available, while Zustand, being a newer library, may have a smaller community and fewer available resources.
6. **TypeScript Support**: Zustand has built-in TypeScript support, making it easier to work with TypeScript projects, whereas Microcall may require additional configuration and libraries for TypeScript integration.

In Summary, Microcall and Zustand differ in their architecture, library size, performance, ease of use, community support, and TypeScript integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zustand
Zustand
Microcall
Microcall

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

It is software that captures call data from any voice platform, stores the data in an SQL database and provides unlimited reporting that improve the management of your voice traffic, allocate telecom costs, detect potential toll fraud, increase employee productivity and ultimately reduce expenses.

Simpler and un-opinionated; Makes hooks the primary means of consuming state; Doesn't wrap your app into context providers; Can inform components transiently (without causing render)
Active Directory Interface; Call Accounting; Instant Toll Fraud notification; Browser-based Telephone Directory
Statistics
Stacks
371
Stacks
0
Followers
157
Followers
0
Votes
34
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Simple API
  • 7
    Unopinionated
  • 5
    Asynchronous action out the box
  • 4
    Supports Redux DevTools
  • 3
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Requires function component
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Zustand, Microcall?

Redux

Redux

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

MobX

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Effector

Effector

It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.

redux-saga

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

vuex

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

redux-thunk

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Statsbot

Statsbot

Statsbot is helping you take control of your raw data, providing an all-in-one analysis tool for engineers and non-tech folks alike.

Unstated

Unstated

State so simple, it goes without saying

digna

digna

Is the game-changing European modern data quality platform that effortlessly uncovers anomalies and errors in your data with Artificial Intelligence.

reselect

reselect

Simple “selector” library for Redux (and others) inspired by getters in NuclearJS, subscriptions in re-frame and this proposal from speedskater.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase