StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Micronaut Framework vs Next.js

Micronaut Framework vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework
Stacks186
Followers330
Votes52

Micronaut Framework vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Micronaut Framework and Next.js are two popular frameworks used for developing applications. Both frameworks have their specific strengths and use cases. Understanding the key differences between Micronaut Framework and Next.js can help in choosing the right framework for a particular project.

  1. Language compatibility: Micronaut Framework is primarily focused on Java and Kotlin, allowing developers to build microservices and serverless applications using these languages. On the other hand, Next.js is a React-based framework that is used for building modern web applications with JavaScript or TypeScript.

  2. Backend vs. Frontend: Micronaut Framework is more backend-focused, providing features for server-side development, microservices, and cloud-native applications. In contrast, Next.js is geared towards frontend development, offering capabilities for building interactive user interfaces and dynamic web applications.

  3. Configuration and Dependency Injection: Micronaut Framework emphasizes compile-time dependency injection, which helps improve performance and reduce runtime overhead. In comparison, Next.js uses a more runtime-based approach for managing configurations and dependencies, catering more towards frontend development needs.

  4. Server-side rendering: Next.js is renowned for its server-side rendering capabilities, enabling faster initial page loads and improved SEO performance. In contrast, Micronaut Framework is not primarily designed for server-side rendering, focusing more on server-side logic and microservices architecture.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js benefits from a large and active community, offering a wide range of plugins, extensions, and resources to enhance web development processes. Micronaut, although newer, is rapidly growing in popularity with a strong developer community that contributes to its ecosystem expansion.

  6. Technology Stack Integration: Micronaut Framework provides seamless integration with technologies like AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Micronaut Data for data access, enabling efficient cloud-native development. On the other hand, Next.js integrates well with popular front-end frameworks like React Native for building mobile applications and various libraries for state management and routing.

In Summary, understanding the distinct features and focus areas of Micronaut Framework and Next.js can help developers select the most suitable framework based on their project requirements and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, Micronaut Framework

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

It is a modern, JVM-based, full-stack framework for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications. It features a Dependency Injection and Aspect-Oriented Programming runtime that uses no reflection.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
build testable microservice ; build serverless applications; JVM based framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
186
Followers
5.1K
Followers
330
Votes
330
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 12
    Compilable to machine code
  • 8
    Tiny memory footprint
  • 7
    Almost instantaneous startup
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Tiny compiled code size
Cons
  • 3
    No hot reload
Integrations
React
React
GraalVM
GraalVM
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Groovy
Groovy

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Micronaut Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase