Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Microsoft SQL Server vs WatermelonDB: What are the differences?
## Key Differences between Microsoft SQL Server and WatermelonDB
<Write Introduction here>
1. **Data Storage Model**: Microsoft SQL Server is a traditional relational database management system, storing data in tables with predefined schemas, while WatermelonDB is a more modern database specifically designed for mobile and web applications, utilizing a NoSQL data storage model, enabling flexible data structures.
2. **Offline Support**: WatermelonDB has built-in support for offline data persistence and synchronization, allowing applications to function seamlessly without connectivity, while Microsoft SQL Server requires additional configuration and handling to support offline functionality.
3. **Performance**: Microsoft SQL Server is optimized for large-scale data handling and complex queries, providing high performance for enterprise-level applications, whereas WatermelonDB is geared towards mobile and web applications with a focus on faster data access and smoother user experience.
4. **Query Language**: Microsoft SQL Server uses SQL (Structured Query Language) for querying and managing data, offering a powerful and standardized querying language, whereas WatermelonDB uses a custom query language tailored for client-side database operations, simplifying development for front-end developers.
5. **Cross-Platform Compatibility**: Microsoft SQL Server can run on Windows-based servers and is widely supported across various platforms, whereas WatermelonDB is designed for use primarily on mobile platforms (iOS and Android) and web environments, limiting its cross-platform compatibility compared to SQL Server.
6. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: Microsoft SQL Server benefits from a vast community of users and extensive third-party tools and integrations, providing comprehensive support and resources for developers, while WatermelonDB, being a newer and specialized database solution, may have a smaller community and fewer ecosystem resources available.
In Summary, Microsoft SQL Server and WatermelonDB differ in their data storage models, offline support, performance, query language, cross-platform compatibility, and community support.
I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:
- I need to use either MySQL or PostgreSQL on a Linux based OS. Which would be better for this application?
- I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
Hi Erin,
Honestly both databases will do the job just fine. I personally prefer Postgres.
Much more important is how you store the audio. While you could technically use a blob type column, it's really not ideal to be storing audio files which are "several hours long" in a database row. Instead consider storing the audio files in an object store (hosted options include backblaze b2 or aws s3) and persisting the key (which references that object) in your database column.
Hi Erin, Chances are you would want to store the files in a blob type. Both MySQL and Postgres support this. Can you explain a little more about your need to store the files in the database? I may be more effective to store the files on a file system or something like S3. To answer your qustion based on what you are descibing I would slighly lean towards PostgreSQL since it tends to be a little better on the data warehousing side.
Hey Erin! I would recommend checking out Directus before you start work on building your own app for them. I just stumbled upon it, and so far extremely happy with the functionalities. If your client is just looking for a simple web app for their own data, then Directus may be a great option. It offers "database mirroring", so that you can connect it to any database and set up functionality around it!
Hi Erin! First of all, you'd probably want to go with a managed service. Don't spin up your own MySQL installation on your own Linux box. If you are on AWS, thet have different offerings for database services. Standard RDS vs. Aurora. Aurora would be my preferred choice given the benefits it offers, storage optimizations it comes with... etc. Such managed services easily allow you to apply new security patches and upgrades, set up backups, replication... etc. Doing this on your own would either be risky, inefficient, or you might just give up. As far as which database to chose, you'll have the choice between Postgresql, MySQL, Maria DB, SQL Server... etc. I personally would recommend MySQL (latest version available), as the official tooling for it (MySQL Workbench) is great, stable, and moreover free. Other database services exist, I'd recommend you also explore Dynamo DB.
Regardless, you'd certainly only keep high-level records, meta data in Database, and the actual files, most-likely in S3, so that you can keep all options open in terms of what you'll do with them.
Hi Erin,
- Coming from "Big" DB engines, such as Oracle or MSSQL, go for PostgreSQL. You'll get all the features you need with PostgreSQL.
- Your case seems to point to a "NoSQL" or Document Database use case. Since you get covered on this with PostgreSQL which achieves excellent performances on JSON based objects, this is a second reason to choose PostgreSQL. MongoDB might be an excellent option as well if you need "sharding" and excellent map-reduce mechanisms for very massive data sets. You really should investigate the NoSQL option for your use case.
- Starting with AWS Aurora is an excellent advise. since "vendor lock-in" is limited, but I did not check for JSON based object / NoSQL features.
- If you stick to Linux server, the PostgreSQL or MySQL provided with your distribution are straightforward to install (i.e. apt install postgresql). For PostgreSQL, make sure you're comfortable with the pg_hba.conf, especially for IP restrictions & accesses.
Regards,
I recommend Postgres as well. Superior performance overall and a more robust architecture.
Pros of Microsoft SQL Server
- Reliable and easy to use139
- High performance102
- Great with .net95
- Works well with .net65
- Easy to maintain56
- Azure support21
- Full Index Support17
- Always on17
- Enterprise manager is fantastic10
- In-Memory OLTP Engine9
- Easy to setup and configure2
- Security is forefront2
- Faster Than Oracle1
- Decent management tools1
- Great documentation1
- Docker Delivery1
- Columnstore indexes1
Pros of WatermelonDB
- Undefined is not an object (evaluating 'columnSchema.ty1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Microsoft SQL Server
- Expensive Licensing4
- Microsoft2