Middleman vs Wintersmith: What are the differences?
Middleman: A static site generator using all the shortcuts and tools in modern web development. Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment; Wintersmith: Flexible, minimalistic, multi-platform static site generator built on top of node.js. Wintersmith is a simple yet flexible static site generator. It takes contents (markdown, less, scripts, etc), transforms them using plugins and outputs a static website (html, css, images, etc) that you can host anywhere.
Middleman and Wintersmith can be categorized as "Static Site Generators" tools.
Some of the features offered by Middleman are:
- Sass for DRY stylesheets
- Multiple asset management solutions, including Sprockets
On the other hand, Wintersmith provides the following key features:
- Flexible - Wintersmith tries not to put any limitations on how you work with your content. You can transform it using plugins and structure it as you please.
- Templating - Use your favorite templating engine, it comes bundled with a Jade plugin and there is community made plugins for most other node.js templating engines.
- Markdown - No more fiddling around with WYSIWYG editors. Once you start using Markdown to author your content you'll never look back!
Middleman and Wintersmith are both open source tools. Middleman with 6.49K GitHub stars and 696 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Wintersmith with 3.48K GitHub stars and 349 GitHub forks.
What is Middleman?
What is Wintersmith?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What are the cons of using Middleman?
What are the cons of using Wintersmith?
What companies use Wintersmith?
What tools integrate with Middleman?
[FREE] We use middleman for its ease and speed to develop and deploy micro/marketing sites.
Flexible static site generator, doesn't need to be more complex than this.