StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Milligram vs mini.css

Milligram vs mini.css

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Milligram
Milligram
Stacks38
Followers81
Votes50
GitHub Stars10.2K
Forks738
mini.css
mini.css
Stacks39
Followers57
Votes4
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks202

Milligram vs mini.css: What are the differences?

# Milligram vs mini.css

Milligram and mini.css are two popular minimalistic CSS frameworks that aim to provide a lightweight and simple foundation for building websites. Although they both have a minimal footprint, there are key differences between the two that developers should consider when choosing a framework for their project.

1. **Grid System**: Milligram utilizes a flexible and customizable grid system based on Flexbox, allowing for more control over layout designs. On the other hand, mini.css offers a simpler grid system with predefined classes for easy implementation but less flexibility in customization.

2. **Typography**: Milligram focuses on providing a responsive and visually appealing typography system with predefined styles for headings, paragraphs, and other text elements. In contrast, mini.css offers a more basic typography setup, making it suitable for projects that require less emphasis on typography design.

3. **Component Library**: Milligram comes with a set of basic components such as buttons, forms, and tables, providing a starting point for building interfaces. mini.css, on the other hand, offers a larger selection of components and utilities out of the box, making it more suitable for projects that require a wider range of UI elements.

4. **Design Philosophy**: Milligram follows a more minimalistic and lightweight design philosophy, focusing on providing only essential styles and components to keep the framework lean. mini.css, while still minimalistic, offers a bit more design flair and customization options for developers looking to add some personality to their projects.

5. **Customization Options**: Milligram is designed to be easily customizable with the ability to override default styles and components with custom CSS. mini.css, on the other hand, provides less flexibility for customization, as its styles are more tightly integrated and may require more effort to override.

In Summary, Milligram and mini.css differ in terms of grid system flexibility, typography options, component library size, design philosophy, and customization options, making them suitable for different types of projects based on specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Milligram
Milligram
mini.css
mini.css

Milligram provides a minimal setup of styles for a fast and clean starting point. Specially designed for better performance and higher productivity with fewer properties to reset resulting in cleaner code.

mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.2K
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
738
GitHub Forks
202
Stacks
38
Stacks
39
Followers
81
Followers
57
Votes
50
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Flexbox
  • 6
    Weightless
  • 4
    Consistent
  • 4
    Responsiveness
Pros
  • 4
    Works great on mobile and loads very fast

What are some alternatives to Milligram, mini.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase