mini.css vs miso

Overview

mini.css

Stacks39

Followers57

Votes4

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks202

miso

Stacks3

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.3K

Forks153

mini.css vs miso: What are the differences?

mini.css: Responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework. mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project; miso: 🍜 A tasty Haskell front-end framework. Miso is a small "isomorphic" Haskell front-end framework featuring a virtual-dom, diffing / patching algorithm, event delegation, event batching, SVG, Server-sent events, Websockets, and an extensible Subscription-based subsystem.

mini.css and miso belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

mini.css and miso are both open source tools. mini.css with 2.67K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than miso with 1.33K GitHub stars and 95 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

mini.css	miso
mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.	Miso is a small "isomorphic" Haskell front-end framework featuring a virtual-dom, diffing / patching algorithm, event delegation, event batching, SVG, Server-sent events, Websockets, and an extensible Subscription-based subsystem.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.0K	GitHub Stars 2.3K
GitHub Forks 202	GitHub Forks 153
Stacks 39	Stacks 3
Followers 57	Followers 13
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Works great on mobile and loads very fast	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Haskell

What are some alternatives to mini.css, miso?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

mini.css and miso are both open source tools. mini.css with 2.67K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than miso with 1.33K GitHub stars and 95 GitHub forks.

mini.css vs miso