Skeleton vs mini.css

Overview

Skeleton

Stacks54

Followers100

Votes24

GitHub Stars19.7K

Forks3.1K

mini.css

Stacks39

Followers57

Votes4

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks202

Skeleton vs mini.css: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of web development, choosing the right front-end framework can significantly impact the design and functionality of a website. Two popular CSS frameworks, Skeleton and mini.css, offer different features and advantages to developers.

Grid System: Skeleton utilizes a 12-column grid system, providing a flexible layout structure for creating responsive designs. In contrast, mini.css's grid system is based on a 16-column grid, offering more granularity and control over the layout.
Customization Options: mini.css allows for more extensive customization with a modular approach, enabling developers to pick and choose specific components to include in their projects. On the other hand, Skeleton provides a simpler, more opinionated framework with less room for customization.
File Size: mini.css has a smaller file size compared to Skeleton, making it a lightweight option for projects where performance optimization is critical. This can lead to faster loading times and improved user experience.
Documentation: Skeleton is well-documented and comes with detailed guides and examples for developers to reference. In comparison, mini.css's documentation may not be as comprehensive, requiring users to rely on their knowledge or community support.
Browser Compatibility: While both frameworks boast good browser compatibility, mini.css has been praised for its excellent support across various browsers, including older versions. This can be beneficial for projects that need to cater to a wider audience.
Community Support: Skeleton has a larger and more established community compared to mini.css, which can be advantageous for developers seeking resources, tutorials, and assistance from like-minded individuals.

In Summary, Skeleton and mini.css offer unique features such as grid systems, customization options, file size, documentation, browser compatibility, and community support that cater to different developer preferences and project requirements in the realm of front-end frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton	mini.css
Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.	mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.
Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 19.7K	GitHub Stars 3.0K
GitHub Forks 3.1K	GitHub Forks 202
Stacks 54	Stacks 39
Followers 100	Followers 57
Votes 24	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Minimalist 6 Responsive 4 Simple 2 Fantastically straight forward 1 Lightweight, clean syntax Cons 0 Have to make design decisions	Pros 4 Works great on mobile and loads very fast

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, mini.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Skeleton vs mini.css: What are the differences?

Grid System: Skeleton utilizes a 12-column grid system, providing a flexible layout structure for creating responsive designs. In contrast, mini.css's grid system is based on a 16-column grid, offering more granularity and control over the layout.
Customization Options: mini.css allows for more extensive customization with a modular approach, enabling developers to pick and choose specific components to include in their projects. On the other hand, Skeleton provides a simpler, more opinionated framework with less room for customization.
File Size: mini.css has a smaller file size compared to Skeleton, making it a lightweight option for projects where performance optimization is critical. This can lead to faster loading times and improved user experience.
Documentation: Skeleton is well-documented and comes with detailed guides and examples for developers to reference. In comparison, mini.css's documentation may not be as comprehensive, requiring users to rely on their knowledge or community support.
Browser Compatibility: While both frameworks boast good browser compatibility, mini.css has been praised for its excellent support across various browsers, including older versions. This can be beneficial for projects that need to cater to a wider audience.
Community Support: Skeleton has a larger and more established community compared to mini.css, which can be advantageous for developers seeking resources, tutorials, and assistance from like-minded individuals.

Skeleton vs mini.css

Overview