UDash vs mini.css

Overview

mini.css

Stacks39

Followers57

Votes4

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks202

UDash

Stacks1

Followers7

Votes11

GitHub Stars449

Forks37

mini.css vs UDash: What are the differences?

mini.css: Responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework. mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project; UDash: Scala and Scala.js Reactive Web Framework. A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.

mini.css and UDash can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

mini.css and UDash are both open source tools. mini.css with 2.67K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than UDash with 348 GitHub stars and 28 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

mini.css	UDash
mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.	A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.
-	Shared Scala code; Type-safe; Compiled to JavaScript; Reactive data bindings; UI components; CSS; i18n; Generator; Backend independent; Open Source; IDE support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.0K	GitHub Stars 449
GitHub Forks 202	GitHub Forks 37
Stacks 39	Stacks 1
Followers 57	Followers 7
Votes 4	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Works great on mobile and loads very fast	Pros 1 Shared scala code 1 Type-safe 1 Compiled to JS 1 Reactive Data Bindings 1 Type-safe RPC & REST
Integrations
No integrations available	Scala JavaScript jQuery Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to mini.css, UDash?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

mini.css and UDash are both open source tools. mini.css with 2.67K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than UDash with 348 GitHub stars and 28 GitHub forks.

UDash vs mini.css