Robot Framework vs mockk

Overview

Robot Framework

Stacks345

Followers525

Votes120

mockk

Stacks40

Followers23

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.7K

Forks387

Robot Framework vs mockk: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Robot Framework and mockk, it is important to understand the key differences between these two automation testing frameworks.

Testing Approach: Robot Framework follows a keyword-driven approach where tests are written in natural language using keywords, making it easy for non-programmers to understand and write test cases. On the other hand, mockk is a mocking framework specifically designed for Kotlin-based projects, allowing developers to easily create mock objects for testing purposes.
Language Support: Robot Framework supports multiple programming languages like Python, Java, and .NET, making it versatile for a wide range of projects. In contrast, mockk is designed specifically for Kotlin projects, providing seamless integration and compatibility within the Kotlin ecosystem.
Scope of Testing: Robot Framework is a more general-purpose automation testing framework that can be used for UI, API, and database testing. In contrast, mockk is primarily focused on mocking objects for testing purposes, making it more specialized for unit testing scenarios in Kotlin projects.
Ease of Use: Robot Framework is known for its user-friendly syntax and extensive documentation, making it easier for new users to get started with automation testing. Mockk, being a specialized mocking framework, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Kotlin or mocking concepts.
Community Support: Robot Framework has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing access to a wealth of resources, plugins, and support for users. On the other hand, mockk, being a newer and more specialized framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for users seeking help or guidance.

In Summary, the key differences between Robot Framework and mockk lie in their testing approach, language support, scope of testing, ease of use, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robot Framework	mockk
It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.	It is an open-source library focused on making mocking in Kotlin great. It is a library with the possibility of mocking default arguments, final classes, varargs, coroutines and extension methods.
-	Object mocks; Static mocks; Constructor mocks; Partial argument matching; Mocking default arguments; Mocking final classes; Mocking varargs; Hierarchical mocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 387
Stacks 345	Stacks 40
Followers 525	Followers 23
Votes 120	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Easy with CI/CD 22 Open Source 21 Simple Usage 14 Easily extendable 13 Vast Scope more than Front End Cons 8 Nested Loops 1 Mostly for python 1 Devtooling is not there 0 Extensive library support 0 Mobile supports	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Kotlin

What are some alternatives to Robot Framework, mockk?

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Robot Framework vs mockk: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Robot Framework and mockk, it is important to understand the key differences between these two automation testing frameworks.

Testing Approach: Robot Framework follows a keyword-driven approach where tests are written in natural language using keywords, making it easy for non-programmers to understand and write test cases. On the other hand, mockk is a mocking framework specifically designed for Kotlin-based projects, allowing developers to easily create mock objects for testing purposes.
Language Support: Robot Framework supports multiple programming languages like Python, Java, and .NET, making it versatile for a wide range of projects. In contrast, mockk is designed specifically for Kotlin projects, providing seamless integration and compatibility within the Kotlin ecosystem.
Scope of Testing: Robot Framework is a more general-purpose automation testing framework that can be used for UI, API, and database testing. In contrast, mockk is primarily focused on mocking objects for testing purposes, making it more specialized for unit testing scenarios in Kotlin projects.
Ease of Use: Robot Framework is known for its user-friendly syntax and extensive documentation, making it easier for new users to get started with automation testing. Mockk, being a specialized mocking framework, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Kotlin or mocking concepts.
Community Support: Robot Framework has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing access to a wealth of resources, plugins, and support for users. On the other hand, mockk, being a newer and more specialized framework, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for users seeking help or guidance.

In Summary, the key differences between Robot Framework and mockk lie in their testing approach, language support, scope of testing, ease of use, and community support.