Mojolicious vs Phalcon: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Architecture: Mojolicious is a Perl-based web framework that follows a non-blocking event-loop architecture, allowing for high performance and scalability, while Phalcon is a PHP-based framework built as a C-extension, providing faster execution speed and reduced resource consumption.

2. ORM Support: Mojolicious does not have built-in ORM support, while Phalcon comes with its powerful ORM, simplifying database operations and relationships with automatic object mapping.

3. Templating Engine: Mojolicious utilizes its innovative built-in template engine for rendering content, while Phalcon offers support for multiple templating engines, including Volt and Blade.

4. Learning Curve: Mojolicious uses a more traditional approach for web development in Perl, which may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, whereas Phalcon's documentation and community support make it more accessible and easier to learn for PHP developers.

5. Community and Support: Mojolicious has a smaller but active community compared to Phalcon, which has a larger user base and extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and solutions to issues.

6. Extension and Customization: Phalcon allows for more flexibility and customization through its extension capabilities, enabling developers to create their reusable modules, whereas Mojolicious provides a more integrated framework approach with less extensibility options.

In Summary, Mojolicious and Phalcon differ in architecture, ORM support, templating engine, learning curve, community support, and extension/customization capabilities.