MongoDB vs OrbitDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
MongoDB and OrbitDB are both popular database systems used in web development. While they share similarities in terms of being NoSQL databases and designed to handle large amounts of data, there are key differences that set them apart.
-
Data Structure: MongoDB is a document-oriented database, where data is stored in JSON-like documents. It allows for flexible schemas and is suitable for unstructured or semi-structured data. On the other hand, OrbitDB is a distributed peer-to-peer database that stores data in data structures known as "logs", "documents", and "key-value stores". It provides strong data consistency and is designed for decentralized applications.
-
Data Replication: MongoDB offers various replication options, including replica sets that provide high availability and automatic failover. It uses a primary-secondary model, where the primary node handles all write operations, while the secondary nodes replicate data asynchronously. OrbitDB, being a distributed database, automatically replicates data across multiple peers in the network, ensuring data availability even when some peers go offline. It uses CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) for conflict resolution.
-
Query Language: MongoDB uses a powerful query language called MongoDB Query Language (MQL) that allows for complex queries, including filtering, projection, sorting, and aggregation operations. It supports a wide range of query options and indexes for efficient data retrieval. OrbitDB, on the other hand, uses a simplified query language that supports basic operations like search by key-value and range queries. It is designed for simple data retrieval in distributed environments.
-
Scalability: MongoDB is designed to scale horizontally by adding more servers to distribute the data and workload. It supports sharding, where data is divided into smaller, manageable chunks called shards that can be distributed across different servers. This allows for handling large amounts of data and high traffic loads. OrbitDB, being a peer-to-peer database, is inherently scalable as each peer can store and serve data. Adding more peers increases the storage capacity and performance of the database.
-
Consensus Mechanism: MongoDB uses a primary-secondary replication model, where the primary node accepts write operations and propagates them to secondary nodes. It uses an internal consensus protocol to ensure data consistency among the nodes. OrbitDB, being a distributed database, uses a consensus mechanism based on the distributed hash table (DHT) technology. It achieves consensus by reaching an agreement among the peers on the order and validity of data updates.
-
Use Case: MongoDB is commonly used for various applications, including content management systems, e-commerce platforms, and data analytics. Its flexibility and scalability make it suitable for a wide range of use cases. OrbitDB, on the other hand, is specifically designed for decentralized applications and use cases where data needs to be stored and synchronized across multiple peers in a distributed network.
In summary, MongoDB is a document-oriented database that provides flexibility, powerful query capabilities, and horizontal scalability. OrbitDB, on the other hand, is a distributed peer-to-peer database designed for decentralized applications, offering strong data consistency, simplified query language, and inherent scalability.
