StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MongoDB vs TokuMX

MongoDB vs TokuMX

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
TokuMX
TokuMX
Stacks6
Followers16
Votes3
GitHub Stars705
Forks97

MongoDB vs TokuMX: What are the differences?

Introduction

MongoDB and TokuMX are both NoSQL databases that are widely used for scalability, high performance, and efficient data handling. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart in terms of features and functionality. This article aims to highlight these differences in order to provide a better understanding of which database might be suitable for specific use cases.
  1. Replication protocol: MongoDB uses a replication protocol based on a primary-secondary model, where one server acts as the primary and others are secondaries. On the other hand, TokuMX utilizes an improved protocol, known as fractal tree replication, which offers enhanced durability, better performance, and higher write scalability.

  2. Storage engine: MongoDB uses the WiredTiger storage engine, which offers better compression, improved concurrency, and support for more advanced features like document-level locking. In contrast, TokuMX uses the Fractal Tree storage engine, which is specifically designed to provide better compression ratio, faster write speeds, and more efficient disk space utilization.

  3. Concurrency control: MongoDB uses a single global write lock for each database, restricting parallel write operations across collections. In TokuMX, however, multi-granularity locking is implemented, enabling multi-operation concurrency at various levels, including document, collection, and database. This allows for higher concurrency and improved performance in TokuMX.

  4. Durability and crash recovery: MongoDB provides a write concern feature that allows users to control the acknowledgment of writes and ensure data durability. TokuMX, on the other hand, offers stronger durability guarantees by implementing WAL (Write Ahead Logging) and using a crash-safe storage engine. This ensures that data is not lost even in the event of system failures.

  5. Data compression: While both databases offer data compression capabilities, TokuMX employs a more advanced compression algorithm called Fractal Tree Indexing, which provides superior compression ratios compared to MongoDB. This helps to reduce storage footprint and optimize IO performance, especially in scenarios where disk space is a constraint.

  6. Query performance optimization: MongoDB has an extensive query optimization framework that allows users to analyze and improve the performance of their queries. TokuMX builds upon this by introducing a feature called Fractal Tree Indexing, which provides faster and more efficient index lookups, resulting in improved query performance for workloads with complex query patterns.

In Summary, MongoDB and TokuMX differ in terms of replication protocol, storage engine, concurrency control, durability, data compression, and query performance optimization. These differences make them suitable for different use cases, depending on the specific requirements of an application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, TokuMX

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
TokuMX
TokuMX

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

TokuMX is a drop-in replacement for MongoDB, and offers 20X performance improvements, 90% reduction in database size, and support for ACID transactions with MVCC. TokuMX has the same binaries, supports the same drivers, data model, and features of MongoDB, because it shares much of its code with MongoDB.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
705
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
97
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
6
Followers
82.0K
Followers
16
Votes
4.1K
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 3
    When your two-week MongoDB love affair ends, try this

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, TokuMX?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase