Mozilla Brick vs Skeleton: What are the differences?
Developers describe Mozilla Brick as "UI Components for Modern Web Apps". Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know. On the other hand, Skeleton is detailed as "A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development". Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.
Mozilla Brick and Skeleton belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
Mozilla Brick and Skeleton are both open source tools. It seems that Skeleton with 16.8K GitHub stars and 2.93K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mozilla Brick with 3.05K GitHub stars and 229 GitHub forks.
What is Mozilla Brick?
What is Skeleton?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Mozilla Brick?
What companies use Mozilla Brick?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Mozilla Brick?
What tools integrate with Skeleton?
Like Bootstrap, It offers the same CSS framework service (Which I prefer to say cheatsheet ;)) but less complex and cleaner look and to the point.
I used it for some private stuff lately where I only needed a grid and was looking for the leanest framework there is.