MXNet vs Tensorflow Lite

Overview

MXNet

Stacks49

Followers81

Votes2

Tensorflow Lite

Stacks74

Followers144

Votes1

MXNet vs Tensorflow Lite: What are the differences?

Key Differences between MXNet and Tensorflow Lite

Deployment Target: MXNet is designed for deploying models on a wide range of devices, from cloud servers to mobile devices, while Tensorflow Lite is specifically optimized for running on mobile and embedded devices. This difference in target platforms can affect the performance and efficiency of model inference on different types of devices.
Ease of Use: MXNet provides a more user-friendly interface and easier deployment process compared to Tensorflow Lite, which requires more effort to set up and configure for mobile deployment. This difference can be crucial for developers looking for a smoother development and deployment experience.
Model Compatibility: MXNet supports a wider variety of machine learning models and frameworks, making it more flexible for integrating models from different sources. On the other hand, Tensorflow Lite is optimized specifically for models created in TensorFlow, limiting the compatibility with models from other frameworks.
Hardware Acceleration Support: MXNet offers more extensive support for hardware acceleration technologies, such as GPUs and TPUs, which can significantly improve the performance of model inference. While Tensorflow Lite also supports hardware acceleration, the range of supported hardware may be more limited compared to MXNet.
Community Support: Tensorflow Lite benefits from the extensive community support of TensorFlow, including a wide range of resources, tutorials, and pre-trained models. MXNet also has a supportive community but may have fewer resources and community contributions compared to TensorFlow Lite.
Size of Model Files: Tensorflow Lite typically produces smaller model files compared to MXNet, making it more suitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices with limited storage capacity. This difference in model file size can be crucial for mobile and embedded applications where storage space is a concern.

In Summary, MXNet and Tensorflow Lite differ in deployment targets, ease of use, model compatibility, hardware acceleration support, community support, and size of model files, impacting their suitability for various machine learning and deployment scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

MXNet	Tensorflow Lite
A deep learning framework designed for both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and imperative programming to maximize efficiency and productivity. At its core, it contains a dynamic dependency scheduler that automatically parallelizes both symbolic and imperative operations on the fly.	It is a set of tools to help developers run TensorFlow models on mobile, embedded, and IoT devices. It enables on-device machine learning inference with low latency and a small binary size.
Lightweight;Portable;Flexible distributed/Mobile deep learning;	Lightweight solution for mobile and embedded devices; Enables low-latency inference of on-device machine learning models with a small binary size; Fast performance
Statistics
Stacks 49	Stacks 74
Followers 81	Followers 144
Votes 2	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 User friendly	Pros 1 .tflite conversion
Integrations
Clojure Python Java JavaScript Scala Julia	Python Android OS iOS Raspberry Pi

What are some alternatives to MXNet, Tensorflow Lite?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

MXNet vs Tensorflow Lite: What are the differences?

Key Differences between MXNet and Tensorflow Lite

Deployment Target: MXNet is designed for deploying models on a wide range of devices, from cloud servers to mobile devices, while Tensorflow Lite is specifically optimized for running on mobile and embedded devices. This difference in target platforms can affect the performance and efficiency of model inference on different types of devices.
Ease of Use: MXNet provides a more user-friendly interface and easier deployment process compared to Tensorflow Lite, which requires more effort to set up and configure for mobile deployment. This difference can be crucial for developers looking for a smoother development and deployment experience.
Model Compatibility: MXNet supports a wider variety of machine learning models and frameworks, making it more flexible for integrating models from different sources. On the other hand, Tensorflow Lite is optimized specifically for models created in TensorFlow, limiting the compatibility with models from other frameworks.
Hardware Acceleration Support: MXNet offers more extensive support for hardware acceleration technologies, such as GPUs and TPUs, which can significantly improve the performance of model inference. While Tensorflow Lite also supports hardware acceleration, the range of supported hardware may be more limited compared to MXNet.
Community Support: Tensorflow Lite benefits from the extensive community support of TensorFlow, including a wide range of resources, tutorials, and pre-trained models. MXNet also has a supportive community but may have fewer resources and community contributions compared to TensorFlow Lite.
Size of Model Files: Tensorflow Lite typically produces smaller model files compared to MXNet, making it more suitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices with limited storage capacity. This difference in model file size can be crucial for mobile and embedded applications where storage space is a concern.

MXNet vs Tensorflow Lite

Overview