StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Nameko vs RapidSMS

Nameko vs RapidSMS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RapidSMS
RapidSMS
Stacks2
Followers4
Votes0
GitHub Stars653
Forks302
Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468

Nameko vs RapidSMS: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Nameko and RapidSMS

  1. Architecture: Nameko is a microservices framework specifically designed for building event-driven, microservices architecture. On the other hand, RapidSMS is primarily focused on providing tools for building SMS-based applications, making it more suitable for communication and messaging purposes.

  2. Functionality: Nameko offers a wide range of features such as dependency injection, RPC, and event dispatch mechanisms to support the development of complex, distributed systems. RapidSMS, on the contrary, is centered around SMS integration, providing functionalities like SMS parsing, handling, and dispatching for SMS-based applications.

  3. Use Cases: Nameko is commonly used in scenarios where building complex, distributed systems with multiple services and communication channels is required. In contrast, RapidSMS is more suitable for applications that rely heavily on SMS communication, such as messaging platforms, surveys, and data collection systems.

  4. Community Support: Nameko has a smaller community compared to RapidSMS due to its niche focus on microservices architecture. RapidSMS, being widely used in SMS-based applications and global health initiatives, has a larger and more diverse community contributing to its development and support.

  5. Flexibility: Nameko offers more flexibility in terms of service-oriented architecture, allowing developers to build and scale services independently. RapidSMS, while highly tailored for SMS applications, may have limitations in adapting to different types of communication channels or use cases.

  6. Learning Curve: Due to its focus on microservices architecture and event-driven design, Nameko may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to these concepts. On the other hand, RapidSMS, with its emphasis on SMS integration, may be easier for developers familiar with messaging platforms and communication technologies.

In Summary, Nameko is tailored for building complex, event-driven microservices architectures, while RapidSMS is designed specifically for developing SMS-based applications with a focus on communication and messaging functionalities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RapidSMS, Nameko

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RapidSMS
RapidSMS
Nameko
Nameko

It is a free and open-source framework for rapidly building mobile services for scale. It is built with Python and Django and is designed for building robust, highly customized mobile services with web-based dashboards. It provides a flexible platform and modular components for large-scale data collection, managing complex workflows, and automating data analysis.

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

Rapidly build mobile services for scale;build robust, highly customized mobile services ;Web-based dashboards
Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
653
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Forks
302
GitHub Forks
468
Stacks
2
Stacks
20
Followers
4
Followers
79
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
Django
Django
Windows
Windows
Debian
Debian
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to RapidSMS, Nameko?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot