StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Graph Databases
  4. Graph Databases
  5. Neo4j vs RocksDB

Neo4j vs RocksDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Neo4j
Neo4j
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.4K
Votes351
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.5K
RocksDB
RocksDB
Stacks141
Followers290
Votes11
GitHub Stars30.9K
Forks6.6K

Neo4j vs RocksDB: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Neo4j and RocksDB

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Neo4j and RocksDB, two popular database systems.

  1. Scalability: Neo4j is a highly scalable graph database that excels at handling complex relationships. It supports horizontal scaling by distributing data across multiple servers. RocksDB, on the other hand, is a high-performance key-value store. It is designed to handle large amounts of data with low latency and high throughput. While it also supports horizontal scaling, it does not offer native graph capabilities like Neo4j.

  2. Data Model: Neo4j follows the property graph model, where data is stored in nodes and relationships. It supports rich queries and traversals through graph algorithms. RocksDB, on the other hand, is a simple key-value store that does not provide built-in graph-specific features. It is optimized for key-value-based operations and does not support complex graph querying or traversal.

  3. Consistency: Neo4j provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data is always in a consistent state. It supports ACID transactions and provides data integrity by enforcing referential constraints. RocksDB, on the other hand, offers eventual consistency, which means that it allows for eventual reconciliation of data across distributed systems. It does not provide strict ACID guarantees like Neo4j.

  4. Data Storage: Neo4j stores data in a disk-based storage model, making it suitable for handling large datasets that exceed the available memory. It optimizes disk storage for efficient data access and retrieval. RocksDB, on the other hand, is an in-memory storage engine that can be used alongside disk storage for faster data access. It is designed to provide low-latency operations by minimizing disk I/O.

  5. Performance: Neo4j is known for its powerful graph query capabilities, allowing for expressive and complex queries. It leverages advanced indexing and caching techniques to optimize query performance. RocksDB, on the other hand, offers high write and read throughput for key-value operations. It can efficiently handle large workloads with high concurrency and low latency.

  6. Use Cases: Neo4j is often used in applications where complex relationships and graph analysis are required. It finds applications in social networks, fraud detection, recommendation systems, and knowledge graphs. RocksDB, on the other hand, is suited for use cases that require high-performance key-value storage, such as caching, session stores, and time-series data storage.

In summary, Neo4j is a scalable graph database with powerful graph query capabilities, strong consistency, and disk-based storage model, while RocksDB is a high-performance key-value store optimized for low-latency operations, eventual consistency, and in-memory storage. They serve different use cases and have different strengths in terms of data modeling, querying capabilities, and storage optimizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Neo4j, RocksDB

Jaime
Jaime

none at none

Aug 31, 2020

Needs advice

Hi, I want to create a social network for students, and I was wondering which of these three Oriented Graph DB's would you recommend. I plan to implement machine learning algorithms such as k-means and others to give recommendations and some basic data analyses; also, everything is going to be hosted in the cloud, so I expect the DB to be hosted there. I want the queries to be as fast as possible, and I like good tools to monitor my data. I would appreciate any recommendations or thoughts.

Context:

I released the MVP 6 months ago and got almost 600 users just from my university in Colombia, But now I want to expand it all over my country. I am expecting more or less 20000 users.

56.4k views56.4k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Neo4j
Neo4j
RocksDB
RocksDB

Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions.

RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage. RocksDB can also be the foundation for a client-server database but our current focus is on embedded workloads. RocksDB builds on LevelDB to be scalable to run on servers with many CPU cores, to efficiently use fast storage, to support IO-bound, in-memory and write-once workloads, and to be flexible to allow for innovation.

intuitive, using a graph model for data representation;reliable, with full ACID transactions;durable and fast, using a custom disk-based, native storage engine;massively scalable, up to several billion nodes/relationships/properties;highly-available, when distributed across multiple machines;expressive, with a powerful, human readable graph query language;fast, with a powerful traversal framework for high-speed graph queries;embeddable, with a few small jars;simple, accessible by a convenient REST interface or an object-oriented Java API
Designed for application servers wanting to store up to a few terabytes of data on locally attached Flash drives or in RAM;Optimized for storing small to medium size key-values on fast storage -- flash devices or in-memory;Scales linearly with number of CPUs so that it works well on ARM processors
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
30.9K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
6.6K
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
141
Followers
1.4K
Followers
290
Votes
351
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 69
    Cypher – graph query language
  • 61
    Great graphdb
  • 33
    Open source
  • 31
    Rest api
  • 27
    High-Performance Native API
Cons
  • 9
    Comparably slow
  • 4
    Can't store a vertex as JSON
  • 1
    Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost
Pros
  • 5
    Very fast
  • 3
    Made by Facebook
  • 2
    Consistent performance
  • 1
    Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed

What are some alternatives to Neo4j, RocksDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase