StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Text & Language Models
  4. Machine Learning As A Service
  5. Neptune vs Paperspace

Neptune vs Paperspace

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Paperspace
Paperspace
Stacks4
Followers20
Votes0
Neptune
Neptune
Stacks16
Followers38
Votes2

Neptune vs Paperspace: What are the differences?

Introduction

Neptune and Paperspace are two popular platforms used for machine learning experimentation and model deployment. While both platforms offer similar features, there are key differences that set them apart. Below are the main differences between Neptune and Paperspace:

  1. Pricing Model: Neptune offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly fee based on the selected plan and the number of seats. On the other hand, Paperspace follows a usage-based pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources consumed, such as GPU hours and storage usage. This allows users to have more flexibility in managing their costs based on their usage patterns.

  2. Collaboration and Sharing: Neptune provides advanced collaboration features, allowing teams to work together seamlessly. It offers features like sharing experiments, results, and insights with team members, as well as tracking changes made by different users. In contrast, Paperspace offers limited collaboration features and does not provide dedicated tools for team collaboration, making it more suitable for individual users.

  3. Model Deployment: Paperspace has a stronger focus on model deployment and provides a platform for deploying machine learning models with ease. It offers options for deploying models as RESTful APIs or as Docker containers, with built-in support for scaling and monitoring. Neptune, on the other hand, does not have specific features for model deployment, and users may need to rely on other platforms or custom solutions for this purpose.

  4. Experiment Tracking: Neptune specializes in experiment tracking and provides comprehensive tools for managing experiments, including tracking code changes, parameter tuning, and model performance. It offers version control for code and datasets, making it easier to track and reproduce experiments. Paperspace also has experiment tracking capabilities but is more focused on providing a complete machine learning development environment rather than dedicated experiment management.

  5. Platform Flexibility: Paperspace allows users to spin up their own virtual machines or use pre-configured templates for specific machine learning tasks. This flexibility enables users to customize their environment to their specific requirements. Neptune, on the other hand, offers a cloud-based solution and is designed to be used directly within the browser, providing a more streamlined and accessible experience without the need for server setup or configuration.

  6. Customer Support: Neptune offers personalized customer support through various channels, including live chat, email, and conference calls, ensuring prompt assistance for any queries or technical issues. Paperspace also provides customer support but primarily relies on a community forum for resolving user questions and issues. Neptune's dedicated support team gives users access to direct assistance, making it more suitable for users who require more immediate and responsive support.

In Summary, Neptune and Paperspace differ in their pricing models, collaboration and sharing features, focus on model deployment, experiment tracking capabilities, platform flexibility, and customer support. Depending on specific requirements and preferences, users can choose the platform that best aligns with their needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Paperspace
Paperspace
Neptune
Neptune

It is a high-performance cloud computing and ML development platform for building, training and deploying machine learning models. Tens of thousands of individuals, startups and enterprises use it to iterate faster and collaborate on intelligent, real-time prediction engines.

It brings organization and collaboration to data science projects. All the experiement-related objects are backed-up and organized ready to be analyzed, reproduced and shared with others. Works with all common technologies and integrates with other tools.

Intelligent alert; Two-factor authentication; Share drives; Unlimited power; Multiple monitors; Remote access; Simple management.
Experiment tracking; Experiment versioning; Experiment comparison; Experiment monitoring; Experiment sharing; Notebook versioning
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
16
Followers
20
Followers
38
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Supports both gremlin and openCypher query languages
  • 1
    Aws managed services
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have much community support
  • 1
    Doesn't have proper clients for different lanuages
  • 1
    Doesn't have much support for openCypher clients
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Swift
Swift
Postman
Postman
Airtable
Airtable
Azure IoT Hub
Azure IoT Hub
PyTorch
PyTorch
Keras
Keras
R Language
R Language
MLflow
MLflow
Matplotlib
Matplotlib

What are some alternatives to Paperspace, Neptune?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

NanoNets

NanoNets

Build a custom machine learning model without expertise or large amount of data. Just go to nanonets, upload images, wait for few minutes and integrate nanonets API to your application.

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

Inferrd

Inferrd

It is the easiest way to deploy Machine Learning models. Start deploying Tensorflow, Scikit, Keras and spaCy straight from your notebook with just one extra line.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope