NestJS vs Ratpack: What are the differences?
Developers describe NestJS as "A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient and scalable server-side applications by @kammysliwiec". Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming)
Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.. On the other hand, Ratpack is detailed as "A toolkit for web applications on the JVM". It is a set of Java libraries for building scalable HTTP applications
It is a lean and powerful foundation. Its apps are lightweight, fast, composable with other tools and libraries, easy to test and enjoyable to develop..
NestJS and Ratpack can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Some of the features offered by NestJS are:
- Extensible - Gives you true flexibility by allowing use of any other libraries thanks to modular architecture.
- Versatile - An adaptable ecosystem that is a fully-fledged backbone for all kinds of server-side applications.
- Progressive - Takes advantage of latest JavaScript features, bringing design patterns and mature solutions to node.js world.
On the other hand, Ratpack provides the following key features:
- Lean & powerful HTTP apps
- toolkit for creating high performance web applications
NestJS and Ratpack are both open source tools. NestJS with 18.3K GitHub stars and 1.31K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Ratpack with 1.81K GitHub stars and 366 GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, NestJS has a broader approval, being mentioned in 19 company stacks & 70 developers stacks; compared to Ratpack, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.