Water.css vs new.css

Overview

Water.css

Stacks6

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.6K

Forks502

new.css

Stacks3

Followers12

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.0K

Forks128

Water.css vs new.css: What are the differences?

Water.css and new.css are two popular CSS frameworks used for styling websites. While they both offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences between them.

Grid System: Water.css provides a responsive grid system that allows developers to easily create layout structures. On the other hand, new.css does not include a built-in grid system, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or custom solutions for grid-based layouts.
Component Styles: Water.css offers a minimalistic design approach with only a few default styles applied to HTML elements. In contrast, new.css provides a more opinionated design with pre-styled components such as buttons, forms, and navigation menus, making it easier to create consistent designs without much customization.
Browser Support: Water.css is designed to provide a consistent look across different browsers and versions, including older ones. It aims to support a wide range of browsers, including Internet Explorer 11. On the other hand, new.css focuses on modern browsers and does not provide extensive support for older browsers.
File Size: Water.css is known for its small file size, which helps in reducing the load time of web pages. It aims to provide the necessary styling without unnecessary bloat. In contrast, new.css has a larger file size due to its inclusion of additional styling options and pre-styled components.
Customizability: Water.css is designed to be easily customizable, allowing developers to override the default styles with their own CSS. It provides a solid foundation for building custom designs. In contrast, new.css offers limited customization options, as it is more focused on providing a ready-to-use set of styles and components.
Community and Documentation: Water.css has a relatively smaller community compared to new.css. Consequently, the documentation and available resources may be more limited, making it slightly more challenging for developers to find answers to their questions or seek support when using Water.css. On the other hand, new.css has a larger community and more extensive documentation, making it easier to find help and resources.

In Summary, Water.css and new.css differ in their grid system, component styles, browser support, file size, customizability, and community/documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Water.css	new.css
A css framework that doesn't require any classes. You just include it in your <head> and forget about it, while it silently makes everything nicer.	It is a classless CSS framework to write modern websites using only HTML. It automatically applies a light/dark theme based on your browser's preference. It supports custom color themes and fonts using CSS variables.
Responsive; Modern browser support; Small size (< 2kb); Beautiful; No classes;	~4.5kb in size; Automatically applies a light/dark; Supports custom color themes and fonts using CSS variables
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.6K	GitHub Stars 4.0K
GitHub Forks 502	GitHub Forks 128
Stacks 6	Stacks 3
Followers 24	Followers 12
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
jsDelivr Replit	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Water.css, new.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Water.css vs new.css: What are the differences?

Water.css and new.css are two popular CSS frameworks used for styling websites. While they both offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences between them.

Grid System: Water.css provides a responsive grid system that allows developers to easily create layout structures. On the other hand, new.css does not include a built-in grid system, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or custom solutions for grid-based layouts.
Component Styles: Water.css offers a minimalistic design approach with only a few default styles applied to HTML elements. In contrast, new.css provides a more opinionated design with pre-styled components such as buttons, forms, and navigation menus, making it easier to create consistent designs without much customization.
Browser Support: Water.css is designed to provide a consistent look across different browsers and versions, including older ones. It aims to support a wide range of browsers, including Internet Explorer 11. On the other hand, new.css focuses on modern browsers and does not provide extensive support for older browsers.
File Size: Water.css is known for its small file size, which helps in reducing the load time of web pages. It aims to provide the necessary styling without unnecessary bloat. In contrast, new.css has a larger file size due to its inclusion of additional styling options and pre-styled components.
Customizability: Water.css is designed to be easily customizable, allowing developers to override the default styles with their own CSS. It provides a solid foundation for building custom designs. In contrast, new.css offers limited customization options, as it is more focused on providing a ready-to-use set of styles and components.
Community and Documentation: Water.css has a relatively smaller community compared to new.css. Consequently, the documentation and available resources may be more limited, making it slightly more challenging for developers to find answers to their questions or seek support when using Water.css. On the other hand, new.css has a larger community and more extensive documentation, making it easier to find help and resources.

In Summary, Water.css and new.css differ in their grid system, component styles, browser support, file size, customizability, and community/documentation.