StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs React on Rails

Next.js vs React on Rails

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
React on Rails
React on Rails
Stacks25
Followers54
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.2K
Forks639

Next.js vs React on Rails: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Next.js and React on Rails, it's essential to understand the key differences between these two frameworks to make an informed decision on which one to use for your project.

  1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Support: Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, allowing for improved performance and search engine optimization by delivering fully-rendered HTML pages to the client. React on Rails, on the other hand, primarily focuses on client-side rendering, with server-side rendering being an optional feature that requires additional configuration.

  2. Routing: Next.js provides a file-based routing system where routes are defined based on the file structure of the pages directory. This approach simplifies the routing process, making it easier to organize and manage routes. In contrast, React on Rails relies on external routing libraries like react-router for defining and managing routes, which can add complexity to the routing setup.

  3. Configuration and Setup: Next.js offers a zero-config setup by providing sensible defaults and conventions, allowing developers to start building applications without having to deal with extensive configuration. React on Rails, on the other hand, requires more manual configuration and setup, especially when integrating additional libraries or tools, which can potentially increase the setup time and complexity of the project.

  4. Frameworks Ecosystem: Next.js is a standalone framework with a dedicated ecosystem that includes tools, plugins, and resources specifically designed for Next.js development. React on Rails, on the other hand, is a library that integrates React into the Ruby on Rails framework, leveraging the existing Rails ecosystem for features like database management, asset compilation, and authentication.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Next.js has a growing community with comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and active support channels, making it easier for developers to find help and resources when working with the framework. React on Rails, while benefiting from the larger React and Ruby on Rails communities, may have fewer resources and documentation specific to its integration, leading to potential challenges in troubleshooting and resolving issues.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Next.js and React on Rails, such as server-side rendering support, routing approaches, configuration setup, frameworks ecosystem, and community support, is crucial for choosing the right framework for your web development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, React on Rails

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
React on Rails
React on Rails

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Project Objective: To provide an opinionated and optimal framework for integrating Ruby on Rails with React via the Webpacker gem. React on Rails integrates Facebook's React front-end framework with Rails. React v0.14.x and greater is supported, with server rendering. Redux and React-Router are supported as well, also with server rendering, using execJS.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
server-side rendering; turbolinks compatibility; redux support; react-router support; webpacker support; internationalization
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
5.2K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
639
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
25
Followers
5.1K
Followers
54
Votes
330
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Next.js, React on Rails?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase