StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Spring Framework

Next.js vs Spring Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Framework
Spring Framework
Stacks6.5K
Followers886
Votes0
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key Differences Between Next.js and Spring Framework:

1. **Architecture**: Next.js is a React framework focused on building fast and scalable single-page applications with server-side rendering, while Spring Framework is a Java-based framework that follows a modular and flexible architectural style.
2. **Language Compatibility**: Next.js primarily supports JavaScript and TypeScript for building applications, whereas Spring Framework is designed for Java applications but also provides support for Kotlin.
3. **Frontend vs Backend**: Next.js is mainly used for frontend development, including user interface design and client-side logic, while Spring Framework is commonly used for backend development, handling server-side logic and data processing.
4. **Routing**: Next.js provides automatic route handling based on the file system, making it easy to create pages, while in Spring Framework, routing is typically configured using annotations or XML configuration files.
5. **State Management**: Next.js applications often rely on libraries like Redux or React Context for state management, whereas Spring Framework offers built-in support for managing application state through features like Spring Data and Spring Session.
6. **Deployment**: Next.js applications can be deployed as static websites or server-rendered applications, while Spring Framework applications are typically deployed on servlet containers like Apache Tomcat or Jetty.

In Summary, Next.js and Spring Framework differ in architecture, language compatibility, frontend/backend focus, routing mechanisms, state management approaches, and deployment strategies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Framework, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
juan9222
juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

  • Login
  • Register
  • Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
  • Account Preferences.
  • Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Framework
Spring Framework
Next.js
Next.js

It provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform. The framework's core features can be used by any Java application, but there are extensions for building web applications on top of the Java EE platform.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Lightweight; Dependency Injection; Transaction Management
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
6.5K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
886
Followers
5.1K
Votes
0
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
MySQL
MySQL
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Hibernate
Hibernate
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
React
React

What are some alternatives to Spring Framework, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase