StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Spring MVC

Next.js vs Spring MVC

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Stacks479
Followers519
Votes0
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

  1. Server-side vs Client-side rendering: Next.js is a framework for server-side rendering (SSR) while Spring MVC is primarily used for client-side rendering. With Next.js, the server sends fully rendered HTML pages to the client, resulting in faster initial page load times and improved SEO. On the other hand, Spring MVC relies on the client's web browser to render the HTML pages, which can be slower for the initial load and may have SEO implications.
  2. JavaScript vs Java: Next.js is built using JavaScript, while Spring MVC is based on Java. This difference in programming language affects the development ecosystem, tooling, and community support available for each framework. Developers with a stronger background in JavaScript might find Next.js more familiar and easier to work with, while those experienced in Java may prefer Spring MVC.
  3. Front-end Framework Integration: Next.js has built-in support for popular front-end frameworks like React, allowing developers to easily build complex user interfaces using these frameworks. Spring MVC, on the other hand, is not tightly coupled with any specific front-end framework, giving developers the flexibility to choose their preferred tools and libraries for building the front-end.
  4. Serverless Deployment: Next.js can be easily deployed on serverless platforms like Vercel, which automatically handles scaling and infrastructure management. This makes it easier to deploy and scale Next.js applications without worrying about managing servers or infrastructure. Spring MVC, on the other hand, typically requires manual setup and configuration on server infrastructure.
  5. API Design: Spring MVC provides rich support for building RESTful APIs using the Spring framework, making it a popular choice for developing API-centric applications. Next.js, on the other hand, is more focused on server-side rendering and client-side applications, and may not provide the same level of built-in API development features as Spring MVC.
  6. Development Philosophy: Next.js follows a more modern and opinionated development philosophy, with a focus on simplicity, ease of use, and developer experience. Spring MVC, on the other hand, follows a more traditional and flexible approach, offering a wide range of features and configurations for developers who prefer more control over the application's behavior.

In Summary, Next.js and Spring MVC differ in their rendering approaches, programming languages, front-end framework integrations, deployment options, API design capabilities, and development philosophies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring MVC, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Next.js
Next.js

A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
479
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
519
Followers
5.1K
Votes
0
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Hibernate
Hibernate
React
React

What are some alternatives to Spring MVC, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase