StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Vaadin

Next.js vs Vaadin

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vaadin
Vaadin
Stacks198
Followers279
Votes36
GitHub Stars631
Forks81
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Vaadin: What are the differences?

Introduction

Next.js and Vaadin are both popular frameworks used for web development. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Server-side Rendering vs. Client-side Rendering: Next.js is primarily focused on server-side rendering, which means that the initial rendering of the webpage happens on the server and the HTML is sent to the client. This allows for faster loading times and better SEO optimization. On the other hand, Vaadin uses client-side rendering, where the initial rendering happens on the client's side using JavaScript. This can be beneficial for web applications that require dynamic updates or real-time data.

  2. Language and Ecosystem: Next.js is built on top of React and follows the JavaScript ecosystem. This means that developers with experience in React can easily transition to Next.js. Vaadin, on the other hand, is built using Java and follows the Java ecosystem. Developers familiar with Java can leverage their existing knowledge to build web applications using Vaadin.

  3. Component-based architecture: Next.js follows a component-based architecture, where the webpage is divided into reusable components that can be easily composed together to build complex applications. Vaadin also follows a similar component-based architecture, providing a rich set of pre-built UI components that can be utilized to create web applications.

  4. SEO Optimization: Next.js provides built-in support for server-side rendering, which allows for better SEO optimization. This means that search engines can easily crawl and index the content of the webpage. Vaadin, being a client-side rendering framework, requires additional configuration and efforts to achieve the same level of SEO optimization.

  5. Deployment and Hosting: Next.js applications can be easily deployed and hosted on various platforms, including traditional web servers, cloud services, or serverless environments. Vaadin applications, being built using Java, can also be deployed on different servers or cloud platforms, but may require additional configuration and setup.

  6. Community and Resources: Next.js has a large and active community, with a vast amount of resources and support available online. There are numerous tutorials, documentation, and community-driven packages available for Next.js development. Vaadin also has an active community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Next.js. However, Vaadin's official documentation and support channels are well-maintained and provide extensive guidance for developers.

In summary, Next.js and Vaadin have distinct differences in terms of rendering approach, language, ecosystem, architecture, SEO optimization, deployment options, and community support. Developers can choose between the two based on their specific project requirements, programming language preference, and familiarity with the respective ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vaadin, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vaadin
Vaadin
Next.js
Next.js

It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

-
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
631
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
81
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
198
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
279
Followers
5.1K
Votes
36
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
Cons
  • 3
    Paid for more features
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to Vaadin, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase