Next.js vs Vapor

Overview

Vapor

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes65

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Introduction

Next.js and Vapor are two frameworks that serve different purposes in web development. Next.js is a React framework for building server-side rendered and static websites, while Vapor is a web framework for building server-side Swift applications. Despite their differences, both frameworks offer unique features and capabilities that cater to the specific needs of developers.

Server-side rendering vs Server-side Swift: The first key difference between Next.js and Vapor lies in their core functionality. Next.js focuses on server-side rendering, allowing developers to create dynamic web pages by rendering the HTML on the server before sending it to the client. On the other hand, Vapor is a framework for building server-side Swift applications, where developers write code in Swift for server-side logic and handling HTTP requests and responses.
JavaScript vs Swift: Next.js is built on top of JavaScript, a widely adopted and versatile programming language used for web development. In contrast, Vapor is built using Swift, a powerful and modern programming language developed by Apple. Developers familiar with JavaScript will find it easier to work with Next.js, while those with a background in Swift will find Vapor more suitable.
React vs Server-side Swift: Next.js heavily relies on React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, to create dynamic and interactive web pages. It provides features like component-based architecture, virtual DOM, and a rich ecosystem of reusable components. Vapor, on the other hand, is focused on server-side Swift, allowing developers to leverage Swift's capabilities for building server-side logic, handling databases, and managing application flow.
Client-side vs Full-stack development: Next.js is primarily used for client-side development, where the rendering and logic occur on the client's browser. It can also be used for full-stack development by integrating with server-side technologies such as Node.js and databases. On the other hand, Vapor is designed for full-stack development, allowing developers to build backend services, APIs, and server-side logic using Swift.
Deployment and scalability: Next.js applications can be easily deployed to a wide range of hosting platforms, including traditional web servers, static site generators, and cloud-based platforms. Vapor, being a server-side Swift framework, can be deployed to various cloud providers or hosted on dedicated servers, providing scalability options based on the specific infrastructure requirements of the application.
Community and ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community of developers who contribute to the framework's growth and provide support through forums, documentation, and plugins. It also benefits from a rich ecosystem of React libraries and tools. While Vapor has a smaller community compared to Next.js, it is supported by the vibrant Swift community and benefits from the popularity of the Swift programming language, which has various resources and libraries available.

In summary, Next.js is a React framework focused on server-side rendering and client-side development, while Vapor is a server-side Swift framework designed for building full-stack applications. They differ in their programming languages, core purposes, and deployment options, catering to developers with different skill sets and web development requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Vapor, Next.js

Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k

Comments

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vapor	Next.js
Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 117	Stacks 8.0K
Followers 217	Followers 5.1K
Votes 65	Votes 330
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Fast 11 Swift 10 Type-safe 6 Great for apis 5 Good Abstraction Cons 1 Server side swift is still in its infancy 1 Not as much support available.	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Swift	React

What are some alternatives to Vapor, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Next.js vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Introduction

Server-side rendering vs Server-side Swift: The first key difference between Next.js and Vapor lies in their core functionality. Next.js focuses on server-side rendering, allowing developers to create dynamic web pages by rendering the HTML on the server before sending it to the client. On the other hand, Vapor is a framework for building server-side Swift applications, where developers write code in Swift for server-side logic and handling HTTP requests and responses.
JavaScript vs Swift: Next.js is built on top of JavaScript, a widely adopted and versatile programming language used for web development. In contrast, Vapor is built using Swift, a powerful and modern programming language developed by Apple. Developers familiar with JavaScript will find it easier to work with Next.js, while those with a background in Swift will find Vapor more suitable.
React vs Server-side Swift: Next.js heavily relies on React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, to create dynamic and interactive web pages. It provides features like component-based architecture, virtual DOM, and a rich ecosystem of reusable components. Vapor, on the other hand, is focused on server-side Swift, allowing developers to leverage Swift's capabilities for building server-side logic, handling databases, and managing application flow.
Client-side vs Full-stack development: Next.js is primarily used for client-side development, where the rendering and logic occur on the client's browser. It can also be used for full-stack development by integrating with server-side technologies such as Node.js and databases. On the other hand, Vapor is designed for full-stack development, allowing developers to build backend services, APIs, and server-side logic using Swift.
Deployment and scalability: Next.js applications can be easily deployed to a wide range of hosting platforms, including traditional web servers, static site generators, and cloud-based platforms. Vapor, being a server-side Swift framework, can be deployed to various cloud providers or hosted on dedicated servers, providing scalability options based on the specific infrastructure requirements of the application.
Community and ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community of developers who contribute to the framework's growth and provide support through forums, documentation, and plugins. It also benefits from a rich ecosystem of React libraries and tools. While Vapor has a smaller community compared to Next.js, it is supported by the vibrant Swift community and benefits from the popularity of the Swift programming language, which has various resources and libraries available.

Next.js vs Vapor

Overview

Next.js vs Vapor: What are the differences?