StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. NGINX Unit vs Ratchet PHP

NGINX Unit vs Ratchet PHP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ratchet PHP
Ratchet PHP
Stacks8
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks792
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365

NGINX Unit vs Ratchet PHP: What are the differences?

1. Scalability: NGINX Unit is highly scalable, with the ability to handle high traffic loads efficiently, making it suitable for applications that require high scalability. On the other hand, Ratchet PHP is more limited in terms of scalability compared to NGINX Unit, primarily due to its reliance on traditional PHP servers which may struggle with high traffic loads.

2. Real-time communication: Ratchet PHP is specifically designed for enabling real-time communication between clients and servers through WebSockets, making it a preferred choice for applications that require real-time features such as chat applications or online gaming. NGINX Unit, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for WebSockets, making it less suitable for real-time communication requirements.

3. Configuration flexibility: NGINX Unit offers greater configuration flexibility with the ability to configure different application environments, languages, and routing rules easily. In contrast, Ratchet PHP has a more streamlined configuration process, making it easier to set up but potentially limiting in terms of customization options.

4. Protocol support: NGINX Unit supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and FastCGI, making it suitable for a variety of web applications. On the other hand, Ratchet PHP is focused specifically on WebSockets, limiting its protocol support to real-time communication scenarios.

5. Deployment ease: NGINX Unit is designed for easy deployment and management, providing a user-friendly interface for configuring and monitoring applications. Ratchet PHP, while relatively easy to set up, may require additional configuration and monitoring tools to ensure optimal performance and scalability.

6. Community and support: NGINX Unit is backed by a large and active community of developers and users, providing ongoing support, updates, and resources for users. Ratchet PHP, as a more specialized tool, may have a smaller community and less extensive support compared to NGINX Unit.

In Summary, NGINX Unit and Ratchet PHP differ in terms of scalability, real-time communication support, configuration flexibility, protocol support, deployment ease, and community and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ratchet PHP
Ratchet PHP
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit

It is a loosely coupled PHP library providing developers with tools to create real time, bi-directional applications between clients and servers over WebSockets.

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

Fast & Easy; Components; Compatible
Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Forks
792
GitHub Forks
365
Stacks
8
Stacks
86
Followers
27
Followers
199
Votes
0
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 2
    Python
  • 1
    Ruby
Integrations
Git
Git
PHP
PHP
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
phpPgAdmin
phpPgAdmin
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Ratchet PHP, NGINX Unit?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase