StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. NGINX Unit vs Unicorn

NGINX Unit vs Unicorn

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Unicorn
Unicorn
Stacks479
Followers401
Votes295
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks269
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit
Stacks86
Followers199
Votes11
GitHub Stars5.6K
Forks365

NGINX Unit vs Unicorn: What are the differences?

Introduction

NGINX Unit and Unicorn are both popular application servers used for hosting Ruby on Rails applications. While they both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that set them apart in terms of performance, scalability, and ease of use.

  1. Deployment: NGINX Unit is designed to be a lightweight and dynamic application server that supports multiple languages and frameworks, making it highly flexible for deploying various types of applications. On the other hand, Unicorn is specifically optimized for hosting Ruby on Rails applications, providing a more specialized environment for Rails application deployment.

  2. Scalability: NGINX Unit is known for its ability to easily scale horizontally by adding more instances to handle increased traffic or workload. It also supports dynamic configuration changes without needing to restart the server, making it more adaptable to changing demands. In contrast, Unicorn is more limited in scalability and requires additional tools such as a load balancer to handle high traffic scenarios efficiently.

  3. Configuration: NGINX Unit's configuration is more user-friendly and can be modified on the fly without disrupting the running applications. It uses a JSON-based configuration format that allows for easy management of settings and parameters. Unicorn, on the other hand, relies on a more traditional configuration approach with Ruby code, which can be more complex and require server restarts for changes to take effect.

  4. Performance: NGINX Unit is known for its high performance and efficiency, with low memory consumption and fast request processing capabilities. It is designed to handle large numbers of concurrent connections efficiently, making it ideal for high traffic websites and applications. Unicorn, while reliable and stable, may not offer the same level of performance optimization as NGINX Unit due to its more specialized focus on Ruby on Rails applications.

  5. Ease of Use: NGINX Unit is praised for its ease of use and straightforward setup process, with intuitive configuration options and comprehensive documentation. It is well-suited for developers looking for a quick and efficient way to deploy and manage applications without the need for extensive configuration. Unicorn, while popular among Ruby on Rails developers, may require a steeper learning curve and more manual configuration setup, especially for those new to the platform.

In Summary, NGINX Unit offers a more versatile, scalable, and high-performance solution for hosting various types of applications, while Unicorn provides a specialized and reliable environment specifically tailored for Ruby on Rails applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Unicorn
Unicorn
NGINX Unit
NGINX Unit

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

-
Fully dynamic reconfiguration using RESTful JSON API;Multiple application languages and versions can run simultaneously;Dynamic application processes management (coming soon);TLS support (coming soon);TCP, HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2 routing and proxying (coming soon)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
5.6K
GitHub Forks
269
GitHub Forks
365
Stacks
479
Stacks
86
Followers
401
Followers
199
Votes
295
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 81
    Fast
  • 59
    Performance
  • 36
    Web server
  • 30
    Very light
  • 30
    Open Source
Cons
  • 4
    Not multithreaded
Pros
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Python
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 1
    Node.js
Integrations
No integrations available
Perl
Perl
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Unicorn, NGINX Unit?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase