Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

NGINX Unit

84
195
+ 1
11
Unicorn

494
397
+ 1
295
Add tool

NGINX Unit vs Unicorn: What are the differences?

Introduction

NGINX Unit and Unicorn are both popular application servers used for hosting Ruby on Rails applications. While they both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that set them apart in terms of performance, scalability, and ease of use.

  1. Deployment: NGINX Unit is designed to be a lightweight and dynamic application server that supports multiple languages and frameworks, making it highly flexible for deploying various types of applications. On the other hand, Unicorn is specifically optimized for hosting Ruby on Rails applications, providing a more specialized environment for Rails application deployment.

  2. Scalability: NGINX Unit is known for its ability to easily scale horizontally by adding more instances to handle increased traffic or workload. It also supports dynamic configuration changes without needing to restart the server, making it more adaptable to changing demands. In contrast, Unicorn is more limited in scalability and requires additional tools such as a load balancer to handle high traffic scenarios efficiently.

  3. Configuration: NGINX Unit's configuration is more user-friendly and can be modified on the fly without disrupting the running applications. It uses a JSON-based configuration format that allows for easy management of settings and parameters. Unicorn, on the other hand, relies on a more traditional configuration approach with Ruby code, which can be more complex and require server restarts for changes to take effect.

  4. Performance: NGINX Unit is known for its high performance and efficiency, with low memory consumption and fast request processing capabilities. It is designed to handle large numbers of concurrent connections efficiently, making it ideal for high traffic websites and applications. Unicorn, while reliable and stable, may not offer the same level of performance optimization as NGINX Unit due to its more specialized focus on Ruby on Rails applications.

  5. Ease of Use: NGINX Unit is praised for its ease of use and straightforward setup process, with intuitive configuration options and comprehensive documentation. It is well-suited for developers looking for a quick and efficient way to deploy and manage applications without the need for extensive configuration. Unicorn, while popular among Ruby on Rails developers, may require a steeper learning curve and more manual configuration setup, especially for those new to the platform.

In Summary, NGINX Unit offers a more versatile, scalable, and high-performance solution for hosting various types of applications, while Unicorn provides a specialized and reliable environment specifically tailored for Ruby on Rails applications.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of NGINX Unit
Pros of Unicorn
  • 3
    PHP
  • 2
    Python
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Multilang
  • 1
    Node.js
  • 1
    Ruby
  • 81
    Fast
  • 59
    Performance
  • 36
    Web server
  • 30
    Very light
  • 30
    Open Source
  • 27
    Rack http server
  • 18
    Load balancing
  • 14
    Great process management

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of NGINX Unit
Cons of Unicorn
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 4
      Not multithreaded

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is NGINX Unit?

    NGINX Unit is a dynamic web application server, designed to run applications in multiple languages. Unit is lightweight, polyglot, and dynamically configured via API. The design of the server allows reconfiguration of specific application parameters as needed by the engineering or operations.

    What is Unicorn?

    Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention NGINX Unit and Unicorn as a desired skillset
    What companies use NGINX Unit?
    What companies use Unicorn?
    See which teams inside your own company are using NGINX Unit or Unicorn.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with NGINX Unit?
    What tools integrate with Unicorn?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      GitHubMySQLSlack+44
      109
      50666
      What are some alternatives to NGINX Unit and Unicorn?
      NGINX
      nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
      Docker
      The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
      uWSGI
      The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services.
      Gunicorn
      Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.
      PHP-FPM
      It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.
      See all alternatives