StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Nightmare.js vs Shepherd.js

Nightmare.js vs Shepherd.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nightmare.js
Nightmare.js
Stacks11
Followers26
Votes0
Shepherd.js
Shepherd.js
Stacks14
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.3K
Forks645

Nightmare.js vs Shepherd.js: What are the differences?

  1. Execution Environment: Nightmare.js uses Electron as its execution environment, providing a full featured browser with support for all modern web technologies, while Shepherd.js runs in the user's browser, which may limit the interactions it can perform on web pages.
  2. Use Case: Nightmare.js is primarily used for automating web interactions, such as testing and scraping, whereas Shepherd.js is focused on creating guided tours and tutorials for web applications.
  3. Advanced Features: Nightmare.js offers a range of advanced features like screenshot capture, mouse events simulation, and form filling, while Shepherd.js puts more emphasis on features tailored to onboarding users, like popovers, modals, and tooltips.
  4. Programming Paradigms: Nightmare.js uses a more traditional imperative programming style, where actions are executed one after another in a sequence, while Shepherd.js utilizes a declarative approach, defining a series of steps to be followed.
  5. Integration: Nightmare.js is standalone and can be used independently in any JavaScript project, while Shepherd.js requires integration with the target web application to provide guided tours and walkthroughs.
  6. Community Support: Nightmare.js has a larger community and more extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and troubleshoot issues compared to Shepherd.js.

In Summary, Nightmare.js is more suited for automated interactions and testing on web pages, while Shepherd.js is designed specifically for creating guided tours and tutorials within web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nightmare.js
Nightmare.js
Shepherd.js
Shepherd.js

It is a high-level browser automation library. It lets you simplify deeply nested callbacks into a few sequential statements. Its goal is to expose a few simple methods that mimic user actions.

Shepherd is a JavaScript library that allows you to easily create site tours to guide users through your app or website. It leverages Tippy.js, another open source library, to render dialogs for each tour "step".

Browser automation ; Simplify deeply nested callbacks
Site tour; Navigation; Tutorial; Modal; Tooltips
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
645
Stacks
11
Stacks
14
Followers
26
Followers
22
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Electron
Electron
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Ember.js
Ember.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Nightmare.js, Shepherd.js?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase