Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Nikola

26
27
+ 1
5
Pelican

88
113
+ 1
28
Add tool

Nikola vs Pelican: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of static site generators, two popular options are Nikola and Pelican. While both of them serve the same purpose, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Content Structure: In Nikola, the content structure is based on reStructuredText or Markdown, allowing users to write in plain text with minimal markup. On the other hand, Pelican uses reStructuredText, Markdown, or AsciiDoc, providing a flexible choice for content creation.

  2. Themes and Plugins: Nikola offers a variety of themes and plugins that can be easily integrated into the website. It provides a simple way to customize the appearance and functionality. In contrast, Pelican has a wide range of available plugins and themes, but customization might require more coding and configuration.

  3. Multilingual Support: Nikola has built-in support for multilingual websites, allowing users to create content in different languages easily. Pelican, on the other hand, supports multilingual websites as well, but the implementation might require additional configuration and setup.

  4. i18n and L10n Support: Nikola has integrated support for internationalization (i18n) and localization (L10n), making it easy to translate the website into different languages. Pelican also supports i18n and L10n, but the implementation might require more manual configuration.

  5. Built-in Deployment Options: Nikola offers built-in deployment options, such as deploying to GitHub Pages or deploying via FTP. Users can easily choose the deployment method that suits their needs and deploy the website with minimal effort. Pelican also supports various deployment options, but users might need to configure and set up the deployment themselves.

  6. Speed and Performance: Nikola is known for its fast build times, making it ideal for larger websites or projects with complex requirements. Pelican is also fast, but it might not perform as well as Nikola when dealing with larger or more complex projects.

In Summary, Nikola and Pelican both serve as reliable static site generators, but they differ in terms of content structure, themes and plugins, multilingual support, i18n and L10n capabilities, built-in deployment options, and performance.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Nikola
Pros of Pelican
  • 1
    IPython (Jupyter) Notebooks
  • 1
    Themes and templates with Mako or Jinja2
  • 1
    Implemented in Python
  • 1
    Jinja2
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Jinja2
  • 4
    Implemented in Python
  • 4
    Easy to deploy
  • 3
    Plugability
  • 2
    RestructuredText and Markdown support
  • 1
    Easy to customize
  • 1
    Can run on Github pages

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Nikola?

It is a Python package that allows the user to create static websites using Python metadata. Static websites are safer, use fewer resources, and avoid vendor and platform lock-in.

What is Pelican?

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Nikola?
What companies use Pelican?
    No companies found
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Nikola?
    What tools integrate with Pelican?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Nikola and Pelican?
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    Jekyll
    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
    Postman
    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
    Postman
    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
    Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming.
    See all alternatives