StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Nunjucks vs React

Nunjucks vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Nunjucks
Nunjucks
Stacks86
Followers91
Votes6
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks647

Nunjucks vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Nunjucks and React. Nunjucks is a template engine for JavaScript that allows for server-side rendering, while React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces that focuses primarily on client-side rendering.

  1. Template Engine vs. UI Library: The main difference between Nunjucks and React lies in their primary use cases. Nunjucks is a template engine that focuses on rendering HTML on the server side. It provides features like template inheritance, macros, and filters, making it suitable for generating dynamic HTML content. On the other hand, React is a UI library that is primarily used for building interactive and reusable user interfaces on the client side. It allows for component-based development, virtual DOM manipulation, and efficient rendering of UI updates.

  2. Server-Side vs. Client-Side Rendering: Another significant difference between Nunjucks and React is the way they handle rendering. Nunjucks excels at server-side rendering, where templates are pre-compiled and rendered on the server before being sent to the client. This approach can help improve initial page load times and SEO. In contrast, React focuses on client-side rendering, where components are rendered on the client's browser. This allows for more dynamic and interactive user interfaces, but it requires the client to have JavaScript enabled.

  3. Syntax and Templating Language: Nunjucks and React also differ in their syntax and templating languages. Nunjucks uses a flexible and powerful syntax inspired by jinja2, which allows for template inheritance, logic statements, loops, and other advanced features. It provides a rich set of built-in filters and macros for manipulating data within templates. React, on the other hand, uses JSX (a syntax extension for JavaScript), which combines HTML-like syntax with JavaScript code to define components. JSX allows for embedding JavaScript expressions within templates, making it easier to build dynamic UIs.

  4. Extensibility and Ecosystem: In terms of extensibility and ecosystem, React has a more vibrant and extensive community. It has a large number of third-party libraries and tools available for building complex UI components, managing state, and handling data flow. React also provides official tooling, such as React Developer Tools and Create React App, which streamline development workflows. Nunjucks, while not as widely adopted as React, offers plugins and extensions that allow for customizing its functionality to suit specific use cases.

  5. Learning Curve and Development Experience: When it comes to the learning curve and development experience, React might have a steeper learning curve compared to Nunjucks. React requires developers to understand concepts like component-based architecture, lifecycle methods, and state management. In contrast, Nunjucks follows a more traditional template-based approach, which can be easier to grasp for developers familiar with web templating languages like Jinja2 or Mustache. However, React's extensive documentation and active community can help developers overcome the initial hurdles and provide a more comprehensive development experience.

  6. Integration with JavaScript Ecosystem: Nunjucks and React also differ in their integration with the wider JavaScript ecosystem. Nunjucks can be seamlessly integrated with Node.js and other server-side JavaScript frameworks, allowing for shared code and easy server-side rendering. React, being a client-side library, integrates well with front-end frameworks and tools like Redux, Webpack, and Babel to build scalable and performant applications. React can also be used with server-side rendering frameworks like Next.js and Gatsby to combine the benefits of both server-side and client-side rendering.

In Summary, Nunjucks is a server-side template engine primarily used for rendering dynamic HTML content, while React is a client-side UI library used for building interactive user interfaces. Nunjucks focuses on server-side rendering with a flexible templating language, while React excels at client-side rendering with JSX syntax. React has a larger ecosystem and a steeper learning curve, while Nunjucks is more straightforward and integrates well with server-side JavaScript frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Nunjucks

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Nunjucks
Nunjucks

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
647
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
86
Followers
147.0K
Followers
91
Votes
4.1K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 4
    Supported by Mozilla
  • 2
    Easy sintaxis like JS
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Firefox
Firefox

What are some alternatives to React, Nunjucks?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase