Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Omi

Stacks82

Followers16

Votes0

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.3K

Omi vs React: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When comparing Omi and React, there are key differences to consider in terms of architecture, performance, development approach, and ecosystem.

1. **Virtual DOM**: Omi utilizes a minimalistic Virtual DOM implementation compared to React's more complex reconciler algorithms. This results in Omi being faster in rendering small components but React being more efficient in handling large and complex projects.
   
2. **API Design**: Omi follows a simpler API design with a smaller footprint, making it easier for beginners to grasp. React, on the other hand, offers more features and flexibility in its API, catering to a wider range of use cases but with a steeper learning curve.

3. **State Management**: Omi utilizes Store pattern for managing state where components can directly access and modify shared state. React offers various state management libraries like Redux or Context API, providing more structured and scalable solutions for complex applications.

4. **Component Composability**: Omi promotes component composability through mixins and plugins, allowing easy reusability and extension of component functionalities. React emphasizes component composition through props and higher-order components, enabling more flexible and maintainable component structures.

5. **File Size**: Omi focuses on minimalism, leading to smaller file sizes and quicker setup times for projects. React, with its extensive feature set and ecosystem, tends to have larger file sizes and might require additional optimization for performance-sensitive applications.

6. **Ecosystem and Community**: React has a vast and mature ecosystem with a large community of developers, providing extensive tooling, libraries, and resources for building scalable applications. Omi, being relatively newer, has a smaller ecosystem and community support, which might limit the availability of resources and solutions for complex development scenarios.

In Summary, Omi and React differ in their Virtual DOM implementation, API design, state management approaches, component composability, file sizes, and ecosystem/community support.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

FigForm UI Components

FigForm

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

1

2

Advice on React, Omi

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Omi
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	Tiny size(4KB gzip). Reactive data-binding. Based on Shadow Dom. Shadow DOM merges with Virtual DOM, Omi uses both virtual DOM and real Shadow DOM to make view updates more accurate and faster.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars 13.2K
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks 1.3K
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 82
Followers 147.0K	Followers 16
Votes 4.1K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to React, Omi?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.