Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Oracle vs WatermelonDB: What are the differences?
- Data Model: Oracle uses a relational database management system (RDBMS) with tables, rows, and columns, while WatermelonDB is based on NoSQL database with object-oriented data model and document-based storage.
- Offline Support: WatermelonDB provides built-in offline-first support, allowing for seamless data synchronization and offline access, whereas Oracle requires additional setup and configurations for offline capabilities.
- Performance: WatermelonDB is optimized for mobile applications, offering faster data retrieval and storage for better user experience on mobile devices, unlike Oracle which may have performance issues when used in mobile applications.
- Size and Footprint: WatermelonDB has a smaller footprint and is designed for offline-first mobile apps, making it more lightweight and suitable for mobile devices with limited storage capacity compared to Oracle which may have a larger size and more features best suited for traditional server-based applications.
- Query Language: Oracle uses SQL for data manipulation and retrieval, while WatermelonDB utilizes its own query language optimized for client-side data fetching and syncing, providing a more efficient way to work with data in mobile applications.
- Community Support and Documentation: Oracle has a larger community support and extensive documentation available, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to common issues, whereas WatermelonDB may have a smaller community and limited resources for troubleshooting and development assistance.
In Summary, Oracle and WatermelonDB differ in their data model, offline support, performance, size and footprint, query language, and community support, catering to different needs based on the type of application and platform being used.
We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL-as-a-Service that the users can deploy in any Cloud without concerns from our website at some standard cost. With Oracle Database, developers would have to worry about what they implement and the related costs of each feature but the licensing model from Tibero is just 1 price and we have all features included, so we don't have to worry and developers using our SQLaaS neither. PostgreSQL would be open source. We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL that you can deploy in any Cloud without concerns. PostgreSQL would be the open source option but we need to offer an SQLaaS with encryption and more enterprise features in the background and best value option we have found, it was Tibero Database for PL/SQL-based applications.
We wanted a JSON datastore that could save the state of our bioinformatics visualizations without destructive normalization. As a leading NoSQL data storage technology, MongoDB has been a perfect fit for our needs. Plus it's open source, and has an enterprise SLA scale-out path, with support of hosted solutions like Atlas. Mongo has been an absolute champ. So much so that SQL and Oracle have begun shipping JSON column types as a new feature for their databases. And when Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) announced support for JSON, we basically had our FHIR datalake technology.
In the field of bioinformatics, we regularly work with hierarchical and unstructured document data. Unstructured text data from PDFs, image data from radiographs, phylogenetic trees and cladograms, network graphs, streaming ECG data... none of it fits into a traditional SQL database particularly well. As such, we prefer to use document oriented databases.
MongoDB is probably the oldest component in our stack besides Javascript, having been in it for over 5 years. At the time, we were looking for a technology that could simply cache our data visualization state (stored in JSON) in a database as-is without any destructive normalization. MongoDB was the perfect tool; and has been exceeding expectations ever since.
Trivia fact: some of the earliest electronic medical records (EMRs) used a document oriented database called MUMPS as early as the 1960s, prior to the invention of SQL. MUMPS is still in use today in systems like Epic and VistA, and stores upwards of 40% of all medical records at hospitals. So, we saw MongoDB as something as a 21st century version of the MUMPS database.
Pros of Oracle
- Reliable44
- Enterprise33
- High Availability15
- Hard to maintain5
- Expensive5
- Maintainable4
- Hard to use4
- High complexity3
Pros of WatermelonDB
- Undefined is not an object (evaluating 'columnSchema.ty1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Oracle
- Expensive14